|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| caligirl
|
Fri May-04-07 09:34 PM Original message |
| Ross: No White House Officials On D.C. Madam's List |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aquart
|
Fri May-04-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. So which service DID Congress use? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ian David
|
Fri May-04-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 16. The White House used Hot Military Studs at least 19 times. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| merh
|
Fri May-04-07 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. perhaps Ross was told to go easy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alfredo
|
Fri May-04-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. TV stations have to renew their license, so it might be to their |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| merh
|
Fri May-04-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. true |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alfredo
|
Sat May-05-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 21. No matter how bat the MSM is, they have to deal with an even |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| caligirl
|
Fri May-04-07 09:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 7. Letter to Ross and 20/20> |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| merh
|
Fri May-04-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 18. good letter |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| caligirl
|
Fri May-04-07 11:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 19. thanks, and so far the comments at the waPo site are all negative |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fed-up
|
Fri May-04-07 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. not after the White House ordered them destroyed (records that is) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Patsy Stone
|
Fri May-04-07 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. So |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Demeter
|
Fri May-04-07 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Thanks To: Wite Out! (or is that White House Out?) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| caligirl
|
Fri May-04-07 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. One escort also worked for Monica Goodlings lawyer folks>link |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jackpine Radical
|
Fri May-04-07 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Rub-a-dub-dub |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DBoon
|
Fri May-04-07 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. Did Ross find a horse's head in his bed? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LiberalFighter
|
Fri May-04-07 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Why would Palfrey write in her newsletter that they got their best business |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LiberalFighter
|
Fri May-04-07 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. If the sample that I saw is an example of what Palfrey provided ABC |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mile18blister
|
Fri May-04-07 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Nooooooooooooooooooooooo |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LiberalFighter
|
Fri May-04-07 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. 30,000 phone calls from 2002 to 2006 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WCGreen
|
Fri May-04-07 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. I hate to say I told you so..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Malidictus Maximus
|
Sat May-05-07 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. As much as I'd enjoy the scandal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| coznfx
|
Sat May-05-07 04:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 22. Now there's a mental image I could have done without. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pokercat999
|
Sat May-05-07 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. Of course not KKKarl uses that male escort that had |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Oglethorpe
|
Sat May-05-07 06:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 24. Al Capone's vault |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gorbal
|
Sat May-05-07 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 25. I can't help but think they made a decision not to name names. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cass
|
Sat May-05-07 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 26. Interesting turn-about here by Ross/ABC. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| caligirl
|
Sat May-05-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 27. no they didn't. Someone at dailykos got a tip it might be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rocktivity
|
Sat May-05-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. According to ABC's own web site |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| windy252
|
Sat May-05-07 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. So that means there were definitely WH officals involved? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| musette_sf
|
Sat May-05-07 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. aren't all of Palfrey's employees |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MasonJar
|
Sat May-05-07 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. No surprise; the White Housies prefer Jeff Gannon. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| entanglement
|
Sun May-06-07 03:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 32. That's right, even the DC Madam's girls have standards... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| appleannie1
|
Sun May-06-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Jeff Gannon is probably still sending |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PaDUer
|
Sun May-06-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. Here's her website and... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndianaGreen
|
Sun May-06-07 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. White House officials are into boys, not girls! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Mar 09th 2026, 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC