|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Herman Munster
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:28 AM Original message |
Wesley Clark Endorses Hillary Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WorseBeforeBetter
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. Clinton/Clark? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeFleur1
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. If |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WorseBeforeBetter
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Definitely strengthens, but I wonder if Def Sec is what's in the works? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Will he have been out of the army long enough? I think it has to 10 yrs. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WorseBeforeBetter
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. I didn't read the entire code... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
57. It is frustrating hearing the Secretary of Defense meme.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 01:49 AM Response to Reply #57 |
66. I'm with you on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. You are not alone in your thoughts. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 05:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. it is a probable possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. Clark/Clinton, no surprise there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. How do you feel about that, 48? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Herman Munster
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. have you ever met hillary clinton or spent significant time with her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. People should make there own mind up, not through someone elses endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
54. She didn't vote for the bankruptcy bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #54 |
68. That isn't what common dreams indicated: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
38. I've met her, yes... and Bill, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
34. Hi, TC. I was a Clarkie early in 04 and disappointed that he didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
4. Makes good sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. Very nice....(take cover as some heads explode) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. They'd be an unstoppable ticket, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
7. I would suggest him to be our (Clinton's) next Secretary of Defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Clark can't be Sec of Defense yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
9. Wow. That's quite an endorsement she picked up there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
11. No surprise there :) Oh wait, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
12. i have deep trust in his judgment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcrew2001
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
41. Do you mean she's our woman instead of our girl? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Actually, if Hillary wins & becomes President, we'll be getting two Presidents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
llmart
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #46 |
73. That's exactly how I see it too...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #41 |
55. "Clarkies." "Tool." "Scared." "Didn't have the fortitude." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 12:00 AM Response to Reply #41 |
59. Scared is a poor word to describe a war hero (and someone who stood up to Bush before it was cool) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
14. Clark is a man with integrety, but I never went "ga ga" for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
15. Wow. I was sure he would eventually, but not this soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
16. I think Wes is backing a candidate who can't win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AwareOne
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. You are correct , Hillary will not win a general election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I don't agree with that assessement. Romney doesn't stand a chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonkers
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. You need not be a milion dollar campaign manager to know enough to bank on the narrowmindedness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #19 |
60. Bullshit! I thought the Democratic Party was more Progressive than the Sexists! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:35 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. It all depends who she runs against. I think if guiliani is their nominee, it will be close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcrew2001
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
42. Its funny how Hillary is running to the center in the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 12:09 AM Response to Reply #42 |
61. Clark as VP would counter this (even though he is actually more liberal) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
20. Sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. Not for Hillary and her many supporters it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
26. It will be so wonderful if Hill chooses Wesley as her running mate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Agreed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. I may have told y'all before that a good friend of mine knows a former |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmosh42
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I had felt that she offered him something for an endorsement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcrew2001
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. The Clark endorsement means nothing to Clarkies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaRa
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #28 |
53. Different take from my brother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
29. I find this intriguing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maryallen
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
31. What a disappointment .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rep the dems
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
32. No offense to Clinton supporters, but I am extremely surprised by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Clark is an old friend of the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rep the dems
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Well I'm not saying I won't vote for Hillary against a Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. I'm with you on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
35. Dis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
36. I'm a big Clark fan, but this was a major mistake for the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eagler
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 12:39 AM Response to Reply #36 |
62. I couldn't agree more. This is exactly what some Republicans have said they want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
40. Tells Us A Lot About Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
45. Why does this surprise you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
47. This thread has many dupes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
49. What a turd of an announcement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
50. Probably a deal for a cabinet position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
52. Sorry Wes, I can't follow you there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. I don't really think this will sway most Clark fans to vote Hillary in the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM
![]() |
Sat Sep-15-07 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
58. How Cozy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
63. Well, there you have it. Clinton/Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
64. this cinches it for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
65. Yea, but her voting record is her voting record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 06:10 AM Response to Original message |
67. Wes Clark was the Clintons' "stalking horse" to push Dean out of the way in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Yes, And This Just Confirms It, IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. Yeah the whole "Draft Clark" thing was just a bunch of Clinton operatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
69. Well, maybe he thinks she will win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Sun Sep-16-07 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
70. Oh, Goodness, Quelle Surprise! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC