|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
NeoConsSuck
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 05:52 AM Original message |
Oil discovery rocks Brazil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 05:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is where it is: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celefin
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. Wonderful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 06:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. This field seems quite removed from Argentina & the Falklands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uben
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
3. In other news- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 06:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. And we know why, don't we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 06:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Yep...they've got Carnivals of Mass Destruction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 07:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Bomb their ass, take their gas! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Tue Nov-13-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
83. I think it will not be long before our media starts to demonize the leader of Brazil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 06:11 AM Response to Original message |
6. $100 oil makes more difficult oil and exploration for said possible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
8. The US Invasion will be televised in HD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
10. This extends reliance on fossil fuels. It would be better left undiscovered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baseballhead
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
11. Good for Brazil!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Victoras
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
12. Tupi field |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UndertheOcean
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 07:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. The point is that even those deep well discoveries are still yeilding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 08:12 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Uh huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanstaafl
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 08:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Peak Oil is not a Scam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 09:05 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. ok. but in the meantime the discoveries of "Major Fields" continue..... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #20 |
48. A 90-day supply of oil is now a "major field"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #48 |
60. A huge offshore oil discovery is what this article states and plays it up as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Do you believe a 90-day oil supply is a huge discovery? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nordmadr
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. What you said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 09:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. on the heels of another scam ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. The comments use the Bible for the facts that they need to support him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TWiley
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 07:21 AM Response to Reply #24 |
70. Good Lord |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TWiley
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 07:00 AM Response to Reply #21 |
69. Oh wait, I thought the reasoning for the Iraq war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
47. It is a scam,isn't it?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Cornucopean fallacies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. The problem I have with the anti cornucopean prophecies of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Optimism is more than the denial of problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Okay but the peak oil people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #58 |
68. depends on what pespective you are hearing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. The human ability to reproduce will collapse within 25 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu
![]() |
Mon Nov-12-07 12:02 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Perhaps that would be a blessing, at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon Nov-12-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #53 |
77. Bad example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
66. Deleted message |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon Nov-12-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
76. The temptation is certainly great... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
13. Well, all that carbon should do wonders for Global Warming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
14. Did you guys know that there is terrists in Brazil? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRH
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 12:47 PM Response to Reply #14 |
40. You're early, the CIA are still loading up their C130's, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Judi Lynn
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
15. You told us here FIRST! What a STORY! This is tremendous news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
17. Call to ARMS! Grab your guns! We're gonna do some DESTRUCTION!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davekriss
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
22. 200 days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 10:50 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Thanks for pointing this out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. That was my first calculation as well LOL... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. Oops. I see you beat me to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
27. Brazilians will be doing the Samba in the streets... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. But at least the Brazilians will already be *in the streets* dancing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
28. Well, now Cheney will pick a fight with Brazil. We must bomb Brazil! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. Only as long as the Big Dick is strapped to the bomb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
29. Please leave it in the ground... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
30. "COULD hold AS MUCH AS 8 billion barrels . . . ." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
31. Bush was asked if he heard about the Brazilian oil reserves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
32. So that would be one year's worth of America's oil use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazyriver
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
33. I don't see this as good news. In fact, I wish no more oil is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 11:59 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Don't worry. You aren't alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnie624
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 11:30 AM Response to Reply #33 |
72. A very apt analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
36. Oh, and did I mention they have to go through 7,000 feet of water and 16,000 feet of rock to get it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyepaddle
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Back when I was a Petroleum geologist (in the late 90s) 7.000 feet of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texifornia
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. I'm still there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyepaddle
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. 7000 feet, is that too deep for a TLP a la Shell's Mars platform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texifornia
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Mechanical... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyepaddle
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I think the problem with drilling at that depth has to do with keepeing the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Not to mention the energy yield |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Hummer . . . off? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #36 |
49. Bingo! Can you say EROEI? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beerboy
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
41. Isn't Brazil part of the Axis of Eevil? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. that depends on who finances the extraction project. It won't be cheap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelgb
![]() |
Fri Nov-09-07 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
51. 8 brazilian barrels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadGimp
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
57. We Invade At Dawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
59. Here is one big big reason why we are still talking about oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelligesq
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
62. Yeah? When is Bush-Cheney invading that country? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kelligesq
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
63. Isnt Brazil the country running their cars on sugar cane byproduct?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leaninglib
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #63 |
71. Because oil is far more efficient. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnie624
![]() |
Sun Nov-11-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Efficient for those who collect the profits, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leaninglib
![]() |
Tue Nov-13-07 07:54 AM Response to Reply #73 |
80. Actually, the government's "take" is rather large. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor Cynic
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
64. Coming up on Fox News: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
65. Suddenly the media will pay attention to the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solar_Power
![]() |
Sat Nov-10-07 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
67. Maybe they can export some ethanol to other countries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Mon Nov-12-07 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
78. Question is, will the economic hit men of Exxon come waltzing in to take over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus
![]() |
Mon Nov-12-07 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
79. Sounds like it's time to invade Brazil next... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarkR1717
![]() |
Tue Nov-13-07 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
81. What happened to Peak Oil? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Tue Nov-13-07 09:16 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. It's still there ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC