|
...Many of the rank and file, along with officers to the field command level are very unhappy with what is going on. They feel misused by the government, unable to speak out without risking being punished and generally abandoned.
As far as the officers are concerned, being "generally abandoned" is not the problem - UCMJ Article 88 is: "Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct."
What constitutes "contemptuous words" is left to your CO and the Court to decide.
...Few of them want to be there and they "soldier on" because of a sense of duty and loyalty. Please don't think that they look to suppress our rights and freedoms. Indeed, they (would like to) believe that they are protecting these rights and freedoms.
This raises a couple of myths that I would like to address here; having had 12 years of military service I do feel that I can make these comments.
First, it is true that soldiers "soldier on" because of a sense of "duty and loyalty", But this is not duty and loyalty to what most civilians think. When dipped in the shit-bucket of combat the only thing that counts is your buddies – your duty and loyalty goes to them, not to King and Country. You stay and fight for your buddies, you will not let them down. That's why most wounded soldiers want to go back – to not let their buddies down. They saved your ass, you want to save theirs.
Second, though I just referred to the "shit-bucket of combat", which it is, and which most come to see it as - at one and the same time, especially initially, there is nothing as exhilarating as combat. You are never more alive than when killing your enemy.
Sorry dudes/dudettes, but it is true – when you are an 18 year old male with an automatic weapon there is nothing better than to use it to waste some "bad guys" (as our president calls them). Those thousands of hours you spend playing "war" as a kid attest to the truth of this.
If you truly want an appreciation of how a frontline soldier experiences war, and not the complete bullshit of most books and movies, then read "Goodbye Darkness" by William Manchester.
This leads to my third point – true, most people below E5 (sergeant) or 03 (captain) likely do believe that they are in Iraq (and Afghanistan) to liberate the indigs from tyranny, to fight for "Truth, Justice, and the American Way". Sadly, no matter what they believe, that is not why they are there.
Even more sadly, though they may not "look" to do so, they will ultimately be the ones used to "suppress our rights and freedoms." Again, it will be a question of duty – not a choice of conscience – for they will have been indoctrinated with the belief that they only way to save our democracy is to destroy it. "Hitler's Army" by Bartov, is both a history of the past, and a prediction for our future. ...the anti-war movement of the 60's and 70's lost much credibility by targeting those being taken advantage of along with those taking the advantage. The echoes of this can still be felt in the generally conservative republican orientation of military voters. We have a unique opportunity to turn this around.
Having been there - as one of "those being taken advantage of", and, later, as part of the Peace Movement – I cannot agree that credibility was lost: the movement became ever more broad, ever more credible until the war, ignominiously, ended. Certainly, the Peace Movement is not the reason why most in the military are conservative.
As in most countries, and unfailingly in the US, the military has always been conservative. I see no "unique opportunity to turn this around", but I do see the opportunity to truly "support the troops" by bringing them home.
There was never a good war or a bad peace. Ben Franklin
|