|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| NeoConsSuck
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:16 PM Original message |
| Evangelicals rally behind Palin after pregnancy news |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| liberalmuse
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. This is messed up: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| susanna
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Glad it wasn't just me that thought that was a repulsive statement. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| liberalhistorian
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 11. They wouldn't be so over the fucking moon |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DBoon
|
Tue Sep-02-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 65. remember Dan Quayle and Murphy Brown? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| VoodooGuru
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 24. What a loathsome being. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| saigon68
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:12 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 25. Guess He likes to play |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WillParkinson
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 47. Eh? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bemildred
|
Tue Sep-02-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 60. "Hide the kielbasa" is a reference to sex. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WillParkinson
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #60 |
| 64. Yeah, I got that. Just not sure why it was said. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Quantess
|
Wed Sep-03-08 02:25 AM Response to Reply #64 |
| 67. "Hide the kielbasa" is a "weiner" joke. Gay or straight is not specified, however. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WillParkinson
|
Wed Sep-03-08 02:39 AM Response to Reply #67 |
| 68. And exactly what... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bake
|
Tue Sep-02-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 44. They're just trying to spin it any way they can. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HawkerHurricane
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. McCain could perform a human sacrifice on the White House Lawn... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Velveteen Ocelot
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Can you imagine the reaction if a teenaged daughter of Obama or Biden |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rwheeler31
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. The goofy people vote. by by |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Wilber_Stool
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. They'ed rally behind her even if she |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| scarface2004
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. they would rally behind her.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DUlover2909
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 10. I don't know about that.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| skoalyman
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 63. yes I'd agree they would probably need Xanax after something that evil |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kayell
|
Wed Sep-03-08 04:27 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 71. The bible sanctions burning as a penalty for fornication |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dbonds
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Do they rally around Britney Spears sister also? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| napi21
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. The RW leaders may be spouting this stuff, but I'm not all that convinced |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MichaelHarris
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. What do you expect, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cheap_Trick
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. If these whackjobs are over the moon |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JeanGrey
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. I hate to say I told you so, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fenris
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. It doesn't matter. McCain doesn't need more right-wing votes. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hulk
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. They are all goofy nuts anyway....everyone that I know. They are either psycho or they wise up... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LynnTheDem
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. "pro life values"... and of course, pro death penalty. And pregnant teenagers. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| diamidue
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. pro-life |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| atjrpsych
|
Mon Sep-01-08 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. This is getting kind of weird |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Tue Sep-02-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 59. Welcome to DU - Here is a link to an unusual post that might help you understand their POV a little |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| libodem
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. Aren't these the adoption fanatics? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madrchsod
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. ya.... marry her off to a 18yr old that does`t want kids |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Wednesdays
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. IOKIYAR |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mnhtnbb
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. Of course they're over the moon. The purpose of women is making babies. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dick Seepenz
|
Tue Sep-02-08 01:12 AM Response to Reply #23 |
| 33. What if Gov. Palin gets pregnant HERSELF in office as VP? who cares about the daughter! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Still Sensible
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 26. Reaction Might be Generational |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pampango
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 51. Interesting take. I do think that how independents view this and how we deal with it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Solly Mack
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 27. well, duh....of course they would |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FVZA_Colonel
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 28. They're hypocrites, but we all knew that. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| progressivebydesign
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 29. Yeah, values that force a young girl to marry far too young... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stern21
|
Tue Sep-02-08 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 30. They would ralley around Pol Pot if he said he was against choice. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sutz12
|
Tue Sep-02-08 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
| 31. Look at the bright side.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wolfgangmo
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:54 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 38. Beauty is only skin deep, but... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Quantess
|
Tue Sep-02-08 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 32. Weirdos. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GoddessOfGuinness
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 34. Palin endangered her life as well as that of her unborn fetus |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wolfgangmo
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:58 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 39. She WANTED that "child" to die ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hamsterjill
|
Wed Sep-03-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 74. This is correct. I truly believe. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| knitter4democracy
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
| 35. Which evangelicals? The ones I know aren't going to be happy about this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bdamomma
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 36. Norquist what a POS he is. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Stranger
|
Tue Sep-02-08 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 37. Teenage unmarried sex is "Pro-Life Values"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KansDem
|
Tue Sep-02-08 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. I'm sure Evangelicals would've rallied behind an pregnant, unmarried Chelsea... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Blue_Tires
|
Tue Sep-02-08 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. i though according to fundies, a down syndrome kid was a sign |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ChairmanAgnostic
|
Tue Sep-02-08 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. having unwed preggers 16-17 yr old is a family value? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kwolf68
|
Tue Sep-02-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #42 |
| 45. They will use this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| krabigirl
|
Tue Sep-02-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 43. Over the moon? What would they be saying if this was one of Obama or Biden's daughters? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fascisthunter
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. anti-choicers.... there is nothing "pro-life" about them |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| daggahead
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 48. Friggin Hypocrites |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zanne
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. Gee....They must have missed the Father/Daughter Chastity Ball. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zanne
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. dupe |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| guitar man
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. "Evangelicals cheer 17 year old having unprotected sex" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| guitar man
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. dupe |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AzDar
|
Tue Sep-02-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 54. Excited about a 17-year-old who has ruined her life? Nice. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadrasT
|
Tue Sep-02-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 55. Hypocritical motherfuckers. How dare they. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CanonRay
|
Tue Sep-02-08 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 56. Imagine if that had been Chelsea, eleven years ago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AngryOldDem
|
Tue Sep-02-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 58. Shit, remember Rush Limbaugh back in '92? 'Nuff said. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AngryOldDem
|
Tue Sep-02-08 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 57. To them, that's all that matters. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bamacrat
|
Tue Sep-02-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 61. This is the most hypocritical thing I have heard, so it fits with Evangelicals. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cmutt
|
Tue Sep-02-08 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 62. Please God, let this baby be black. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MetaTrope
|
Tue Sep-02-08 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 66. Soon we'll be hearing that it was an immaculate conception |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sakabatou
|
Wed Sep-03-08 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 69. I thought evangelicals were against "lust-ridden" teens... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bo
|
Wed Sep-03-08 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 70. ...she is a creationist idiot as well right? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nihil
|
Wed Sep-03-08 06:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 72. Wonder how they'd respond to this ...? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hatrack
|
Wed Sep-03-08 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 73. If your daughters have functioning ovaries, you'll have 110% of OUR support!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC