Source:
Market Watch In a letter to the FCC, Senator Nelson (D-FL) urged the FCC to "make public the critical elements of its reform proposal, and seek meaningful input from all impacted stakeholders before taking steps that could have a negative impact on ratepayers."
Senator Clinton (D-NY), in a letter to the FCC, stated, "I am concerned about the initial potential negative impact on consumers, especially those who live in rural areas that depend on smaller and midsize companies for their service. The proposal, as I understand it, would result in a significant loss of revenue for many of the smaller companies, impacting their ability to invest in new jobs and expand and enhance their existing networks. Facing this new burden, many carriers will be forced to pass on costs to customers, resulting in higher fees for many Upstate New York households, including many elderly residents on fixed incomes."
In a separate letter to the FCC, Wyoming Senators Enzi (R) and Barasso (R) said, "This proposal goes well beyond the Internet Service Provider Remand Order . . . The Commission's usual practice of seeking public comment prior to adopting major rules should not be disregarded on issues of this magnitude. We urge you to remove these items from the November 4 agenda and issue a public notice seeking comment from members of public."
Read more:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Growing-Number-Senators-Urge-FCC/story.aspx?guid={B88D47F5-DF61-493E-B346-4B69E692A3CB}
FCC holding a vote on giving large carriers more goodies paid for by customer rate increases. They rushed it through without public comment and it will be on their docket for a vote on Nov 4th.
Is there anything about this that doesn't sound shady?