thebaghwan
(998 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-04 11:44 AM
Original message |
| Spokesman Defends Bush's Military Service |
Noon_Blue_Apples
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
|
litt'l kim
(sorry bout that, she is always the ad on yahoo screens for me recently)
B
|
AZCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. We'll see what happens today... |
|
WH Press Conference should be starting momentarily. Will the media stay alive, or go back into hibernation? Stay tuned!
|
arwalden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I Watched McClellan's Press Conference (Replay) On CSPAN, And He Was So... |
|
nervous and shaky and evasive and repetitive.
Is that "normal" behavior for him, or is he particularly uncomfortable when trying to lie about this subject?
-- Allen
|
AZCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. He's not as smooth a liar as Ari... |
|
The press usually isn't this active- Ari tamed them and it's taken Scott by surprise. He was really sweating yesterday, wasn't he? Shades of Nixon...
|
lumpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. I watched the press conference also. |
|
Most of his answers were repetitive and he could not refrain from interjecting the tired old WMDs message. The man is an automaton. This...is..the...pay..record...showing..that president bush..served..his required..reserve time..honorably blah blah blah... blah..
|
54anickel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-11-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. HA! "There are some not interested in the facts." Maybe because |
|
Bushco now has a proven track record of twisting the "facts" into untruths. "Trolling for trash" - Hell no, we are trolling for truth you dumb SOB.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Feb 20th 2026, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message |