|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 01:54 PM Original message |
House Passes Bill to Punish A.I.G. Bonus Recipients |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. On to the Senate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Is That A Picture Of AIG's Bank Account? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. 11% too low. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RantinRavin
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
4. This will wind up in the courts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. This Should Pull In Billions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wackywaggin
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Just what I thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
26. Lotta attorneys been laid off. Think of it as a job program for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demo dutch
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
49. Nothing but fake outrage by congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waiting For Everyman
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
24. Which exec would be stupid enough to sue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synicus Maximus
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 06:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
44. Actually if they don't get the bonus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. "John Roberts can make his ruling. Now let him enforce it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Belial
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is one of the stupidest things I have seen in a long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. It's (Allegedly) On All Firms That Got > $5 B in Bailout Cash n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 08:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
52. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. I do think it ignores a larger issue - how people get paid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sir pball
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
54. Yeah, I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. But the people who engineered this get off? Is that right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
10. They should not be getting a damn dime. If I fail, if I lose my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
12. They should have simply ordered the employees to delay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodoobo
![]() |
Fri Mar-20-09 07:08 AM Response to Reply #12 |
57. The payout date is no doubt part of the contract |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wackywaggin
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
13. Does anyone find it disgusting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
14. Thats good news... Would like to know who the 93 were that voted against it... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
15. They can challenge this in the courts if they wish, but I heard that most of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. That's A Very Good Point n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
17. Why don't they just say "If you forego the bonus you keep your jobs." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
18. To be fair, I wish they had only sought 81%... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woodsprite
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
19. Seems better than a sternly worded letter from Conyers. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
20. I want to punish the elected and appointed bureaucrats that let this happen. We fire senior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Exactly. The bonus money is only a tiny tip of the iceberg. Why stop at the bonus takers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
22. Almost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahampuba
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
23. Bonuses due to contract, wtf about Pensions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 03:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. It's really very simple: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
28. Now I can get back to my life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
29. House passes bill taxing AIG and other bonuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I have a really dumb but honest question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. It is nothing but congressinoal monkeys putting on a show for a gullible public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. So... business as usual, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I'm still waiting for one of them to ask about AIG's counterparties, but before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. I was about to post the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Proving once again that government is broken and congress is useless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Po_d Mainiac
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. But then the monkeys can demand repayment of the attorney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. I want to see them go down for insurance fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Good luck taxing the British managers of AIG.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. I had wondered about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Better than nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gin
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. did the Senate vote on this too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Juan_de_la_Dem
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
40. How can you pass a retroactive tax? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KakistocracyHater
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 06:14 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. the same way they went |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demo dutch
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 06:24 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. You can't -- Constitutional Law 101 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 08:23 PM Response to Reply #40 |
53. I think that's not a big problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Sparkle
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
42. more than half of the Taliban Party voted against it .... interesting! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demo dutch
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 06:25 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. because it's unconstitutional. the whole thing is nothing more than fake outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugin
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Well then... Consider it a 'fee' to use Public Money for Private Gain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demo dutch
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
46. Sounds unconstitutional to me, you can't enact a law after the fact.. Constitutional Law 101. It's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein
![]() |
Thu Mar-19-09 07:49 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Believe It Or Not, Retroactive Taxes Have Been Done Several Times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mr_smith007
![]() |
Fri Mar-20-09 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
55. THIS IS GREAT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinniped
![]() |
Fri Mar-20-09 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
56. 10% of something is still better than 0% of nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 14th 2024, 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC