|
based on evidence and reason. I "believe" in evolution because the preponderance of the evidence--and certainly scientific consensus--points to the accuracy of the theory. It is based on decades of study of the physical evidence by many scientists. Perhaps "belief" is not exactly the right word. "Tend to believe" or "strongly tend to believe" is better. Science is always challengeable, and invites challenge (or should invite challenge). Something could turn up tomorrow which might overturn the whole theory. For now, that's the best we can do, on the basis of available evidence. If powerful aliens from a much more highly sophisticated civilization "out there" show up tomorrow with convincing proof that they seeded our planet with humans who were genetically close to existing species (in order to make us feel more comfortable here?), we may have to give up our theory of evolution, but we might begin to understand both our feeling of alienation from the natural world and the god concepts that our species has developed. This latter notion is fanciful and also feasible and interesting. But it is not something I "believe." As for belief in God, Thomas Aquinas tried to make a case for God based on reason. His reasoning was that everything has a "cause" (children don't just appear out of nowhere, they are conceived by their parents and are born; a person doesn't just drop dead from a spear wound--a spear wound implies a spear-thrower, even if you can't see the spear-thrower); ergo, there must be a First Cause of everything that is.
It is an interesting line of thought. I've sometimes wondered why the matter in the universe creates order--beautiful spiral galaxies--and life--spiders, wolves, marigolds--and even intricate and seemingly orderly, conscious life. If the Big Bang Theory is correct, why isn't everything just exploding outward with no order at all except blast-order, scattering matter randomly to the further limits of space? The answer to the aggregation of matter seems to be "gravity"--and lately, dark matter--but why would that matter create consciousness (or rather, sentience), or any kind of life? I keep returning to the "Intelligent Design" (do I dare call it a?) theory--which owes its recent Bushwhack, Bible-thumper conception to Thomas Aquinas (a much deeper thinker than any of these stupid anti-educationists and anti-securalists), and wondering...h-m-m...is there something to it? Are consciousness and intelligence somehow wrapped into the universe in some way that we have yet to understand? Belief in God could be an echo in our brains of that unknown phenomenon by which the universe tends to create intelligence--something that may be discovered--investigated, evidence found for it--some day. But until such a discovery--with evidence and repeatable experiment, or whatever new criteria science may one day require--we don't have the slightest clue as to why there is order, beauty and intelligence in the universe. Belief that it is "God" is a good as any other "belief," in this sense of "belief."
"Belief" in aliens, however, can be evidence based. I have long been convinced that life and sentience exist elsewhere on the basis of sheer numbers. There are just so many stars and galaxies--utterly staggering numbers of them--that the odds are overwhelming. Discoveries of the last several decades have reinforced this "belief" --the discovery on earth of exremophiles (life existing here in very extreme conditions, some of it not oxygen-based), and the prevalence of water and various life-creating conditions in our own solar system and everywhere else. The odds have gone from overwhelming to very overwhelming that life may be prevalent in the universe and the development of sentient life and of civilizations is very likely. This is probably what is driving the Vatican to interest itself in the matter. What will it mean to their monolithic, anti-democratic, anti-goddess, woman-despising organization with its false claims of a line of descent back to St. Peter, if sentient life of another kind is discovered at long last? Will they deign to baptize the aliens? Will they ban them from being priests because--as one recent Pope said--they "don't look like Jesus"?
I mean this criticism. I also understand, very deeply, that the Catholic Church has somehow, for all its many faults and crimes, preserved a notion in which I believe: They call it "soul" and have promulgated the reality that every human being has a soul and all souls are equal. I don't call it "soul," when I am being honest with myself. I think it's a quality of the human brain that we almost completely do not understand--something to do with how infants synthesize information to create a unique personality. Every human beings has it. And we are all equal. The Church would say "equal in the eyes of God." I would say equal in the eyes of the higher intelligence that we all potentially possess which understands the uniqueness and compelling importance of each individual human being. Anyway, just wanted to give credit where credit is due--in view of my list of Church sins, above. The Church went through a period in which its theologians argued about whether or not women have souls, but they finally concluded--and certainly their most intelligent and Christ-like theorists always knew--that we do. Will they raise this question about sentient alien life? Can they learn from the mistakes that hubris has led them into?
|