|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Faygo Kid
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 07:59 PM Original message |
Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's good, he's admitting that making belligerent threats with the nukes does not work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whats_a_zip
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 03:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
38. Take the big step... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. IIRC, America had a first-strike policy during The Cold War in certain situations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. This is a stunning shift in military policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. agreed and for me the ponies just keep on coming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Under Bush, The U.S. Explored The Idea Of Using Nukes In Tactical Situations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pasto76
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
28. exactly! Nukes are not something rational folks want to use. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Since it has not been released yet, seems premature to say the least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 10:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Take it up with the Times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 11:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Huh? The report hasn't been released yet and that's doom, gloom and pessimism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tburnsten
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:53 AM Response to Reply #10 |
26. I can think of a couple of other uses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
24601
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 11:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. It's a hit with the anti group. I have reservations that moderate independents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. OBAMA, EXCELLENT. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
7. From a military strategy perspective it's never wise for a commander to advertise when she will use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. In a nuclear MAD scenario it makes excellent sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 09:25 AM Response to Reply #9 |
30. This is a topic upon which military experts disagree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 11:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. You're wrong. He's giving non-nuclear states an incentive to *not* obtain nukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #15 |
29. But recent presidents have threatened Israel's enemies with nukes while allowing Israel to threaten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unkachuck
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
8. talk is cheap (and reversible) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir
![]() |
Mon Apr-05-10 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
13. That's my guy. I sent him an "attaboy" email this afternoon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kpete
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
16. After lengthy review, US plans to adopt a more restrictive policy on using nuclear weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 12:03 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Already posted, just a few stories down in LBN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
18. That's going to make the crazy GOP extremists extremely crazy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
19. Seems like a very good step in the right direction. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 04:29 AM Response to Original message |
20. Did Obama just take another step toward war with Iran? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:07 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. It's an attempt to keep non-nuclear nations compliant with the NPT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 10:43 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Guess Israel doesn't count because they already have nukes, but are noncompliant with the NPT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Israel didn't sign the treaty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 05:36 AM Response to Original message |
21. Color me ignorant but did we actually have a policy to use nukes any old time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deminks
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 06:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Bush Doctrine for nuclear weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 06:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. The article says the pentagon drew up a draft, not that it was already policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deminks
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 08:04 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I can't find an article that definately says it was approved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
25. Not sure what, if anything, this means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 04:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. Re: Not sure what, if anything, this means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:21 AM Response to Reply #25 |
37. This isn't about military strategy, it is about politics. It is about setting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
32. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem
![]() |
Tue Apr-06-10 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
35. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Sparkle
![]() |
Wed Apr-07-10 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
36. It is a good idea, but, why would Russia or any country entry into anther treaty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 04:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC