|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| brooklynite
|
Tue Apr-06-10 09:41 AM Original message |
| David Shuster Suspended Indefinitely (from MSNBC) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HereSince1628
|
Tue Apr-06-10 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Corporations expect sacrifice and loyalty from their slaves |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 27. ...or it could be as simple as a non-compete contract, which he freely signed /nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 34. Where does it say he signed a noncompete? Making a pilot is not competing, unless and until the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 49. It really depends on what his contract says |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Steerpike
|
Fri Apr-09-10 08:07 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 115. Non compete clauses |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Demeter
|
Tue Apr-06-10 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Neither a Dead Girl or a Live Boy in his bed... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Subdivisions
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 64. . n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bette Noir
|
Tue Apr-06-10 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Ooops. I can see why he'd want to change networks, though. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SleeplessinSoCal
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 77. why is it best though to not quit a job before having another one lined up? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ian David
|
Tue Apr-06-10 02:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 78. Plus they made him stop posting to Twitter. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MidwestRick
|
Tue Apr-06-10 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. I won't miss his... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ooglymoogly
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 72. Yeah Fux is much better ain't it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MidwestRick
|
Tue Apr-06-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #72 |
| 80. Possibly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ooglymoogly
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #80 |
| 83. Naw...thats not it.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| truedelphi
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #83 |
| 88. Hey oogly m - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ooglymoogly
|
Tue Apr-06-10 06:27 PM Response to Reply #88 |
| 101. Hi, delphi....nope still sit'n in the same ol' leather recliner. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| truedelphi
|
Wed Apr-07-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #101 |
| 112. First real day of sun after many days of clouds and rain |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| underseasurveyor
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 87. So speaking clearly is now a negative? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MidwestRick
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #87 |
| 89. No |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tarheel_Dem
|
Tue Apr-06-10 10:52 PM Response to Reply #89 |
| 104. Shouldn't that be "enunciating"? Why do I get the feeling you don't care.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 90. He sounds as if he spits out every word. I'd be afraid to sit next to him, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Tue Apr-06-10 10:54 PM Response to Reply #90 |
| 105. Deleted sub-thread |
| pattmarty
|
Tue Apr-06-10 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. Schuster is a great independent reporter. Back in oh 2002 or so............ |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ooglymoogly
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 84. +1 nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pab Sungenis
|
Tue Apr-06-10 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. It's standard in broadcasting. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 35. No It's like the owner of Restaurant B saying "Can you pretend to cook while I watch to see how |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pab Sungenis
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 70. Making a pilot is a lot more than "auditioning." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| quakerboy
|
Tue Apr-06-10 10:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 106. A point of contention |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| me b zola
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 66. David was negotiating his labor contract |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pab Sungenis
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 71. Negotiation is fine |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BumRushDaShow
|
Tue Apr-06-10 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. Seems like a bunch of high-profile jumps |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 37. Todd and Greenspan both have their own shows. I hope someone picks up Shuster, esp. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| benlurkin
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. David Schuster suspended indefinatelyt from MSNBC |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jaxx
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. They should have gotten rid of Dylan Radical instead. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mr. Sparkle
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 18. I dont know how you came to that conclusion. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| benlurkin
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 20. He was on Fox before MSNBC |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mr. Sparkle
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 21. On his wiki entry it said he started his media career in 2003 on MSNBC. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 65. Please see Reply #59. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| benlurkin
|
Tue Apr-06-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 95. Schuster was on Fox from '96 to '02 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 59. If "he" refers to Shuster, yes, but I never heard one RW word or snark from |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 40. When Ratigan was on at 9 a.m., he was totally RW. He moderated after they moved his show. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NotThisTime
|
Tue Apr-06-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 97. This is him MODERATED? I've only heard him in the PM, he's a RW tool |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DJ13
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 19. You dont watch Dylan, do you? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wisteria
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 24. I do and I don't like him. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jaxx
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 26. I watch MSNBC so I watch him. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wisteria
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 22. Yeah, I am not thrilled with this guy. I am real sorry about Shyster. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alfredo
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 29. Dylan's thing is financial news. He really sticks it to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mystieus
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 31. Amen. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 32. Dylan is great. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| onpatrol98
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 54. I like Dylan, too... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pattmarty
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 41. Are you fucking high? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ChicagoSuz219
|
Wed Apr-07-10 03:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 109. I agree... & Joe & Mika, too! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| melm00se
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. not shocking |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| harmonicon
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 48. wouldn't that be normal/ok in almost any other job? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 55. Plenty of people in all fields, including broadcasting, look for a job while still employed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| snappyturtle
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. Oh goody....one of his replacements is Contessa Brewer. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 33. Who's "Mrs. Greenspan?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| radical noodle
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 38. Andrea Mitchell |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:54 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 76. Wow! I had no idea! Thank you! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Justitia
|
Tue Apr-06-10 05:49 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 98. God, she is HORRIBLE. She is a lousy broadcaster on every technical level. They should dump her. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:10 PM Response to Reply #98 |
| 108. she's pretty horrible, but.... GASP! i just found out today that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| florida08
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:53 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 39. lol |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EOTE
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 42. I believe that would be Andrea Mitchell. NT |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Drops_not_Dope
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 62. Andrea Bitchel |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| benlurkin
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 12. How bad does he want to commit career suicide? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wisteria
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:19 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 25. CNN is looking to revamp their image and up their ratings. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bette Noir
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 61. He might be thinking that changing networks is the only way to get his own show. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ooglymoogly
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #61 |
| 85. Its not. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jennicut
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 13. One of the few worth watching in the daytime. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blueworld
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 14. I wonder if CNN ratted on him so they can pay him less if hired? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| melm00se
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 15. it's a small world |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pattmarty
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 45. Conspiracy much? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 60. Much stranger things have happened. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pattmarty
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:32 PM Response to Reply #60 |
| 63. What's up, Elephants? Still startin' shit? Glad to see you're still.............. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 73. Starting shit? LOL. Glad to see you, too! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blueworld
|
Wed Apr-07-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #45 |
| 110. I'll have to waste electrons on the sarcasm tag for you younguns, I guess. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pattmarty
|
Wed Apr-07-10 03:11 PM Response to Reply #110 |
| 111. I'm 63. Didn't seem like satire to me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blueworld
|
Thu Apr-08-10 10:22 AM Response to Reply #111 |
| 113. It was. If you want to criticize,refine & improve me, you'll have to marry me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pattmarty
|
Fri Apr-09-10 08:03 AM Response to Reply #113 |
| 114. Forgot to take our vicodin, did we? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blueworld
|
Fri Apr-09-10 08:20 AM Response to Reply #114 |
| 116. You're a crabby old snark, aren't you? Need more fiber? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blueworld
|
Fri Apr-09-10 08:23 AM Response to Reply #114 |
| 117. Oh yeah - I'm happy to add nasty folks like yourself to my ignore list. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| democrank
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 16. Truth-telling journalists should all be suspended. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mr. Sparkle
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 17. Thats a shame, he is one of MSNBC's better presenters. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 58. Pls. see Reply #55. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wisteria
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 23. CNN should buy out his contract and hire him. He is just the breath of fresh air needed at CNN. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| onehandle
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 28. Sucko. MSNBC dicked him around but good. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. He worked for FOX for 6 years??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| vaberella
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 56. No way. Do you remember Ferris Bueler's Day Off?! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 68. Maybe he was on FOX because he needed a job and TV broadcasting slots are not numerous? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mstinamotorcity
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. He is just taking |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| florida08
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 43. well that's a shame |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| orbitalman
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 44. IS THERE A PLACE WE CAN REGISTER OUR DISPLEASURE? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pattmarty
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 47. Yeah, you just did. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HipChick
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 51. Email M$NBC... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 69. Sure. Contact MSNBC |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| craigmatic
|
Tue Apr-06-10 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. they ought to get rid of scarbourough while they're at it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HipChick
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. I just emailed M$NBC... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| vaberella
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. This isn't the first time right?! He doesn't ever seem to care. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gman
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. Good for Ed Schultz |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| davidwparker
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 57. I like the MSNBC shows from 4-5, 6-7, and 8-midnight, but with a contract |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PfcHammer
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 67. Shister reporting on Shuster |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PCIntern
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 75. Gail is a 27 year acquaintance of mine... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Little Star
|
Tue Apr-06-10 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 74. Bout time! Schuster does not make sure of his facts. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LaPera
|
Tue Apr-06-10 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 79. I like David Shuster, he's never been afraid to get in a lying republicans faces and challenge them, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheCowsCameHome
|
Tue Apr-06-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 81. Why would anyone go to CNN anyway? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bamacrat
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 82. I liked Shuster. He called teabaggers and pukes on their shit more than most on that network. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tx4obama
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 86. MSNBC screwed up when they gave Ratigan one of Shuster's hours. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Justitia
|
Tue Apr-06-10 05:52 PM Response to Reply #86 |
| 99. Amen!!! Ugh! I was so disgusted with this move. -eom |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tx4obama
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 91. Someone should start a 'Fire Ratigan and bring back Shuster' petition. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The_Casual_Observer
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 92. Good wishes to David Shuster! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lobodons
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 93. Perhaps it was Shuster and not Maddow |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| caseymoz
|
Tue Apr-06-10 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 94. About all companies do not tolerate a salaried employee working for a competitor. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Tue Apr-06-10 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 96. Interestingly, when he got suspended for his "pimp out" comment, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Justitia
|
Tue Apr-06-10 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 100. Bad, bad move MSNBC! Shuster is one of the greatest you've got! He's my favorite straight-up rep. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ooglymoogly
|
Tue Apr-06-10 06:31 PM Response to Reply #100 |
| 102. +1 nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tx4obama
|
Tue Apr-06-10 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 103. Tell MSNBC to bring back Shuster! Email: phil.griffin@msnbc.com n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tarheel_Dem
|
Tue Apr-06-10 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 107. I always hoped that MSNBC would try David in the 10 p.m. slot. But, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Mar 16th 2026, 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC