|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 01:29 AM Original message |
NKorea warns of war if punished for ship sinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. This could get really ugly really, really fast. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 01:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. yes, that quickly. NK's statement screams we know we're guilty but don't you dare come after us, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. That's so. "North Korea, reacting swiftly" is not normal.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
36. Er? North Korea *always* flares up instantly at any accusations leveled at them. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Journeyman
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:04 AM Response to Original message |
3. I just don't see what the North Koreans sought to gain in this attack . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arrowhead2k1
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:17 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I think they are trying to provoke a war without "blatantly" firing the first shot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurska
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:07 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Some North Korean sub captain panicked when a ship got close and fired on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 06:07 AM Response to Reply #3 |
18. It could have been a mistake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 07:50 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Admitting mistakes is a weakness of all authoritarian regimes. It's par for the course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrdmk
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. Technically, North and South Korea never ended the war, there was an armistice signed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
33. Give it time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
43. It's not what they can gain......it is that they don't have much to lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Troop
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 04:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
81. Sometimes I think NK doesn't need a reason that anyone else understands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blacksheep214
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
4. It's time to end this! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arrowhead2k1
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. We can't just let the South do as they wish. We have a pact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. We didn't lose the first episode of the Korean Conflict. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arrowhead2k1
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 02:44 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Right, by lost I mean getting pushed back from Manchuria |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurks Often
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 07:33 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. The draft won't be reinstated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
49. China has said, many times, that they won't permit it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. A PRC embargo would invite the repudiation of the US bonds they hold... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 10:14 AM Response to Reply #49 |
65. China has a trillion reasons not to fuck with the US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
53. China and Russia will not allow another US puppet regime to further encircle them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #53 |
66. This is not 1975. Neither have the means to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DRoseDARs
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 03:43 AM Response to Original message |
11. Oh noes, North Korea threatens to get itself obliterated if it keeps this shit up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:25 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. We can certainly rely on China behaving rationally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. If we can count on the soviet bloc (dating myself) as being rational, Kim Jong Il .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 08:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
21. Don't underestimate N. Korea military. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Of course you realise, David, that a very similar description |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. That is true to an extent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:36 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. That's ok, mate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. I'd say the N. Korea ideology has a 20-30% base of support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. And one doesn't need US-level military tech to drop a shitload of artillery on Seoul. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
38. Dont underestimate strategic bombing or NATO. Not been seen since Arc Light |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I do not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. NO nuclear weapons would be required to reduce the north |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #45 |
54. I think that is a wrong assessment of N. Korean structure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #11 |
31. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurks Often
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #31 |
51. The North Korean artillery is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 08:47 AM Response to Reply #51 |
62. Destroyed by what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 10:07 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. They are there now in Japan and on Naval vessels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Diego Garcia is 4,700 miles from North Korea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 04:00 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. The plane used would be a low signature like b2, or F-22 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnlinePoker
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 02:00 PM Response to Reply #62 |
71. North Korea has invasion tunnels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #71 |
77. I saw a neat photo in an early 80's national geographic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurks Often
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 02:56 PM Response to Reply #62 |
72. Destroyed by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lagomorph
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 12:01 AM Response to Reply #31 |
57. The North will.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 02:50 AM Response to Reply #31 |
58. Any disruption to the SK economy will certainly lead to falling markets throughout Asia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
52. Yeah, it'll be another cakewalk. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
14. Makes me think about the sinking of the Belgrano. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angleae
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
44. The sinking of the General Belgrano was not a war crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 08:19 AM Response to Reply #44 |
60. I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:13 AM Response to Original message |
15. the link goes to a different story...unless kim jong il drives a truck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. It has started. NK torpedoed a truck on I-4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimlup
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:41 AM Response to Original message |
16. Not to make light of this serious issue but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
22. This is nothing new... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
23. 'North Korean torpedo' sank South's navy ship - report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Three possible responses from N. Korea: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. There are few cases when an act can be seen as a blatant "Act of War." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 10:07 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. They are already at war technically.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
47. ... Briefers displayed torpedo parts recovered from the Cheonan wreck site: part of a motor, a shaft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
26. The Korean War has never ended - There has been a truce for 57 years but no peace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
34. I support North Korea here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. I think North Korea wants to provoke a war. Time is not on their side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:18 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Maybe true, but people were saying the same thing 20 years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:47 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. 20 years ago China was determined to keep N. Korea propped up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 10:57 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. China is "propping it up" now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #55 |
69. They'll let it fall slowly. They won't allow a catastrophic collapse ala USSR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
protocol rv
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
42. I would ignore North Korea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
48. Three years ago, it seemed NK and SK were headed towards normalizing relations; the Bushistas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurks Often
![]() |
Thu May-20-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 02:53 AM Response to Reply #50 |
59. Well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #59 |
84. Also well said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 08:23 AM Response to Reply #48 |
61. Blame Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
73. It certainly would be "North Korea's fault for attacking .. a ship in peacetime" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 04:09 PM Response to Reply #73 |
80. Yeah, no. They just about started a war when clinton was pres. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobwithout
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 09:41 AM Response to Reply #48 |
63. Oh for God's sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #48 |
67. The north is run by a stroked out madman. If they start a war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #67 |
74. I don't know exactly what happened here, but assuming that the NK captain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 04:08 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. Lets suppose jack has a nuclear weapon, and suppose his neighbor has thousands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #48 |
70. This may come as a surprise, but the United States isn't the only actor in the world. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoonzang
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
75. So the sub intentionally sunk a S. Korean ship in S. Korean waters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. If that has been a us vessel we would be in a shooting war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 05:37 PM Response to Reply #75 |
82. Well, there was the U.S.S. Liberty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoonzang
![]() |
Fri May-21-10 06:31 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Well there is that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rayofreason
![]() |
Sat May-22-10 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
85. The best thing to do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roamer65
![]() |
Sat May-22-10 02:21 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. Sounds like the 1953 ceasefire could end soon if China doesn't get involved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC