|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| Swagman
|
Wed Dec-01-10 05:30 AM Original message |
| Assange rape charge 'could be a set up': Wilkie |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tomm2thumbs
|
Wed Dec-01-10 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. ya think? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Delphinus
|
Wed Dec-01-10 06:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. You said it well. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlphaCentauri
|
Wed Dec-01-10 09:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 32. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TalkingDog
|
Thu Dec-02-10 01:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 36. my response exactly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| xchrom
|
Wed Dec-01-10 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. it's possible -- i'm looking to see if it's reduced to a |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Judi Lynn
|
Wed Dec-01-10 06:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Had he known he had raped someone why would he bring attention to himself. How incautious! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ruperto31
|
Mon Dec-06-10 12:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 59. Rape = taking off a condom or breaking one in Swedish law. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Wed Dec-01-10 07:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 7. What evidence do you expect in a rape case, beyond the words of alleged rapist and alleged victim? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| xchrom
|
Wed Dec-01-10 07:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. dna is sometimes known to be used in a rape case. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Matariki
|
Thu Dec-02-10 01:57 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 40. DNA wouldn't help in this instance as the alleged rape was over a broken condem |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| karynnj
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 11. Exactly, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lance_Boyle
|
Wed Dec-01-10 10:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 15. There is *some* known about one of the women. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| karynnj
|
Wed Dec-01-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 18. I didn't know that - and it completely destroys her credibility |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hissyspit
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 25. More: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pavulon
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:41 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 26. guess she had it coming..(nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hissyspit
|
Wed Dec-01-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 28. Had what coming? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pavulon
|
Wed Dec-01-10 09:05 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 29. If she was a us agent, why not dose him with polonium and blame the russians |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hissyspit
|
Wed Dec-01-10 09:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 31. Or maybe she's just an idiot with an agenda working alone. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| marasinghe
|
Thu Dec-02-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 50. sure. he's a wacko with a death wish. it's like 'suicide-by-cop'. and if that fails, he wants jail. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Matariki
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:02 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 41. Absurd post. Consensual sex - broken condom. Do you call that rape? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dreamnightwind
|
Thu Dec-02-10 06:46 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 42. Indeed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hissyspit
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 23. Links: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mudoria
|
Wed Dec-01-10 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. Could possibly be true too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bragi
|
Wed Dec-01-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 17. Yeah, right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hassin Bin Sober
|
Wed Dec-01-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 19. And how many alleged rapists end up on Interpol's "most wanted" list? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hissyspit
|
Wed Dec-01-10 09:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 30. That doesn't mean shit. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hassin Bin Sober
|
Wed Dec-01-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 34. I think we agree. Mine was a rhetorical question. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hissyspit
|
Wed Dec-01-10 11:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 35. O.k. Gotcha. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hissyspit
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 22. Much more likely it's bullshit. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kaleko
|
Thu Dec-02-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 48. Of course these charges are total bullshit |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Wed Dec-01-10 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. "COULD?" What a strong statement! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| florida08
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. unbelievable |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nihil
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:51 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. Sadly, not *that* unbelievable is it? (n/t) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| florida08
|
Wed Dec-01-10 10:35 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. sadly..no, and more like SOP |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stray cat
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. He could be guilty or innocent like anyone accused |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Yeahyeah
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. They won't tell us though,it's a secret. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Javaman
|
Wed Dec-01-10 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 16. Now wouldn't it be hysterical if Assange has documents that show he's being set up? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| time_has_come
|
Wed Dec-01-10 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. I don't get it. I like theater. That's not going to deter me. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Xithras
|
Wed Dec-01-10 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. It's important to remember that Assange hasn't actually been CHARGED with anything. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pavulon
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:35 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 24. Interpol seems to be involved. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hissyspit
|
Wed Dec-01-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 27. So what? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Thu Dec-02-10 01:50 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 39. The Women in White is a group paid out of the State Department. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Judi Lynn
|
Thu Dec-02-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 43. It's the ultimate in cynicism for the US-supported "dissident" group in Cuba |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Thu Dec-02-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 46. Thank you, Judi! How great is that "Bush Out!" banner. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ellie
|
Thu Dec-02-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 52. Thanks Judi Lynn! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| defendandprotect
|
Mon Dec-06-10 12:20 AM Response to Reply #43 |
| 58. Once again, thank you, Judi Lynn for all this info ... !!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Judi Lynn
|
Thu Dec-02-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 44. Absolutely amazing seeing the connection to the Cuban "dissidents!" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| defendandprotect
|
Mon Dec-06-10 12:17 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 57. Missed this, as well -- late K&R and thanks for the info!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TalkingDog
|
Thu Dec-02-10 01:45 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 37. Nah... just for the ones they want to cow into submission |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Xithras
|
Thu Dec-02-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 45. Interpol doesn't decide. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cbdo2007
|
Wed Dec-01-10 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Or Assange *could* be on the next Nasa mission to the Moon. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ibegurpard
|
Thu Dec-02-10 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. really?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| defendandprotect
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 47. Evidently, Wikileaks had documents which showed this attack would be arranged..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Odin2005
|
Thu Dec-02-10 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. No shit! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| howaboutme
|
Thu Dec-02-10 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 51. First worldwide manhunt in history over a case of ..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| captain jack
|
Fri Dec-03-10 10:46 AM Response to Reply #51 |
| 53. I'm thinking two Myrtle Poor Bear's here. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IDFbunny
|
Fri Dec-03-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 56. Rape by deception |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| askeptic
|
Fri Dec-03-10 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 54. We wouldn't describe as rape what Assange is accused of |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| howaboutme
|
Fri Dec-03-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 55. If the truth were known |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Mar 03rd 2026, 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC