Source:
The GuardianLeaked dispatches reveal diplomats' disdain for Council of Europe's stance against extraditions to US and secret renditions
Afua Hirsch, legal affairs correspondent
Friday December 17 2010 21.30 GMT
US officials regard European human rights standards as an "irritant", secret cables show, and have strongly objected to the safeguards which could protect WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange from extradition. In a confidential cable from the US embassy in Strasbourg, US consul general Vincent Carver criticised the Council of Europe, the most authoritative human-rights body for European countries, for its stance against extraditions to America, as well as secret renditions and prisons used to hold terrorist suspects.
He blamed the council for creating anti-US sentiment and hampering the US war on terror. "The Council of Europe (COE) likes to portray itself as a bastion of democracy, a promoter of human rights, and the last best hope for defending the rule of law in Europe – and beyond," Carver said. "(But) it is an organisation with an inferiority complex and, simultaneously, an overambitious agenda. An investigation (by the Council of Europe) into renditions and 'secret prisons' in Europe connected to the US war on terrorism … created a great deal of controversy and anti-US sentiment in the Council of Europe," wrote Carver.
The European court of human rights, the final court of appeal for human rights claims from the UK, whose judgments include the decision to ban deportations to countries which practise torture, is also singled out by the cables.
=snip=
Amid growing speculation over whether Assange could face extradition to the US, the cables make clear America's opposition to any attempts to interfere on human rights grounds, out of concern for prison conditions in the country. Assange would have the right to appeal against any extradition decision to the European court of human rights if all other legal avenues failed. His lawyers are already forming human rights arguments to block his extradition within the EU.
Read more:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/17/wikileaks-european-human-rights-standards
US embassy cables: European human rights body 'an irritant', says US diplomatguardian.co.uk, Friday December 17 2010 21.30 GMT
SummaryA senior US diplomat reveals contempt for Europe's principal human rights watchdog and its secretary general. Key passage highlighted in yellow:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/196054 Looks like Julian's made his latest move. Check mate in ....?
As I've been saying recently, extradition to the US from any European country is impossible if there is any suggestion whatsoever of an execution and/or if there is any possibility of him being treated in treated in an inhumane or degrading way.
Although a totally different case, the failed attempts by the US to extradite Abu Hamza is a contemporary example of this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Hamza_al-Masri#Extradition_to_US