|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:50 AM Original message |
Himalayan glaciers not melting because of climate change, report finds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. Hmmmm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 09:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
28. Something like this perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ter
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:57 AM Response to Original message |
2. Hahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. I thought this was going to be either Faux, The Daily Mail or The Telegraph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tunkamerica
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. Damn! they've disproven it! Now we must live in a world where pollution is good for all things! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. the Global Warming solution is a trading/tax schema designed to transfer trillions to the bankers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 06:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. well said, here are some further issues, as well as some solutions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. it is hard to sort out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:43 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. yes,corn-based ethanol has been a huge disaster for all but the producers and lobbyists, its a crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
egressingsparrowdrop
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. kool-aid alert... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:09 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I do not hit and run, and your use of kool-aid is juvenile, I weigh all sides of the debate, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
egressingsparrowdrop
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:35 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Of course I do. I'm also intelligent enough to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:48 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. your "there's no "debate" anymore" quote would make any fascist proud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
egressingsparrowdrop
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. should we debate gravity as well, lest we be accused of fascism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 03:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. the last time I checked, AGW is a THEORY, gravity is a LAW, and cap and trade is a poor solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Ummm...you do know that a theory is not conjecture - don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 09:06 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. the main issue is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 10:34 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. solutions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
41. ahhh - LaRouche! Not only do I smell the rat, it now has a name too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:55 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. LaRouche is damn lunatic, & that water project dates from 1950's USA,decades b4 they hijacked it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. LOL!!!1111 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. yup! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. It's UN conspiracy now? What horseshit - the science is robust and settled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. more boilerplate, ad hominen, mentally jingoistic attacks from you, yawnnnn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. Sloganeer this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 06:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Which probably why the Republicans first proposed it as a "Market based solution" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
egressingsparrowdrop
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. The problem "if it exists".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:20 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I am sorry, but I do not blindly accept one side, nor the other, I am a sceptic of all dogma |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
egressingsparrowdrop
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:30 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Oh, it's "dogma," is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
38. There is no dogma regarding AGW - only an abundance of peer reviewed science |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
42. Perhaps you should continue this argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:49 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Where we play nicey nice with LaRouchite UN One-World science conspiracy-mongering climate deniers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Glad to see you're playing with yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-11 10:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
53. Your attitude is the very definition of true science. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
25. I don't find anything flippant in what you've said. Your posts in this thread are substantive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. "the problem, if it exists" Clue - it does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. in interest of civilty, & also to not abuse others on this thread, I wish you well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LawnKorn
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 05:41 AM Response to Original message |
6. The IPCC prediction came from a mis-quote during a telephone interview. It was corrected a year ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 06:16 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. The Far Right Rapturists believe weather and climate are changing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 06:16 AM Response to Original message |
9. once the glacier melts back , the cap or plug at the end is gone and the glacier "runs" quickly out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 06:40 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yes, it would seem that position of the glacial fronts isn't exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
51. WRONG... tibetan glaciers are all melting at extreme rates.. >>..Links>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #11 |
52. WRONG... tibetan glaciers are all melting at extreme rates.. >>..Links>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Fri Jan-28-11 11:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
54. That was the first thing I noticed - glaciers can lose mass (or gain it) with no change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
13. Reality: most Himalayan glaciers are melting, but not in one area - the Karakoram |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groundloop
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:40 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. And of course the deniers will pick up this one little tidbit to prove their point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 09:13 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. It's the Torygraph - what do you expect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
15. it's nice the glaciers in karakorum aren't melting -- how about all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brother Buzz
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
34. California's Sierra glaciers are melting, yet glaciers on California's Mt. Shasta are growing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
47. California's Sierra glaciers aren't shrinking because of global warming either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnie624
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
30. In other words, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
39. Debris on Certain Himalayan Glaciers May Prevent Melting (Science Daily) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Thu Jan-27-11 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
40. Spatially variable response of Himalayan glaciers to climate change affected by debris cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC