|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| woo me with science
|
Mon May-16-11 01:55 PM Original message |
| Strauss-Kahn lawyers see alibi in sex case: report |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BeyondGeography
|
Mon May-16-11 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. So there was no encounter whatsoever? It's all a total fabrication? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BetsysGhost
|
Mon May-16-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. more likely |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BeyondGeography
|
Mon May-16-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 9. I was expecting a plea bargain with a payout on the side |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ClaireF
|
Mon May-16-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 73. No plea bargain.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bragi
|
Mon May-16-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 11. Or someone else commited the rape after he left /nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alcibiades_mystery
|
Mon May-16-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 23. Indeed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. "I caught her stealing my wallet when I came out of the shower" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| former9thward
|
Mon May-16-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 31. Easy except DNA evidence in certain places. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 05:34 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 41. The story thus far is that he attempted to force her to engage in oral sex |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| former9thward
|
Mon May-16-11 05:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 45. I certainly don't know the details but if he attempted to assault her |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 48. Of course there is "DNA at the scene" it was his hotel room |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaL
|
Mon May-16-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 66. I don't know why you keep talking about the wallet. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 07:32 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 71. it is a hypothetical. that's all. it came from nowhere. disregard. just a debating device. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 83. Oh cool, am I part of a conspiracy now? Wow |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Tue May-17-11 07:31 AM Response to Reply #83 |
| 91. Aw, silly...I don't believe that for a minute. Let me get my tongue away from my cheek... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 82. Well read the thread |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muriel_volestrangler
|
Mon May-16-11 04:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 32. She did pick him out at a line-up |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bragi
|
Mon May-16-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 35. If so, that sinks that theory |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren Stupidity
|
Mon May-16-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 36. lineups and mistaken identity go hand in hand. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muriel_volestrangler
|
Mon May-16-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 38. Yes, if the theory is that the assault victim is not in on the conspiracy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 43. Finding DNA evidence of any number of strangers in a hotel room would not be odd |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muriel_volestrangler
|
Mon May-16-11 06:38 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 56. I said 'blood' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 64. Hey OJ Simpson cut his hand on a hotel room glass.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bragi
|
Mon May-16-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 74. Bonus Points! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 05:29 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 39. A burglar in a dark room which she knew had been occupied by the suspect |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaL
|
Mon May-16-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 67. Someone else who was naked in his bathroom? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 68. He was looking for clothes to steal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaL
|
Mon May-16-11 07:56 PM Response to Reply #68 |
| 76. So in your theory the burglar just walked through the hotel naked? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #76 |
| 85. Yes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alcibiades_mystery
|
Mon May-16-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 77. "That a hotel maid could identify the registered guest in a room from a lineup is not surprising" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rug
|
Mon May-16-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 79. I can't wait to see the lineup photo. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. I just emailed my son who is a prosecutor in NYC and asked him if he knows anything |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mz Pip
|
Mon May-16-11 02:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Mine, too! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. Where's your son? Manhattan? Mine works for the Brooklyn DA |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mz Pip
|
Mon May-16-11 02:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Manhattan. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. Can't wait to hear his report! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mz Pip
|
Mon May-16-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. He won't tell me anything. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 02:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 16. Yep, I can only ask my son his "thoughts." He wouldn't be involved since he is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fedsron2us
|
Mon May-16-11 08:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 81. So many allegations and theories. So few facts |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. what if they have a DNA match? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 19. To what? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 03:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 21. To wherever in her body sexual molestation took place. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 24. They take samples from under fingernails... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 27. His reputation in the sexual harassment department is definitely |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 05:48 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 49. Okay.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 06:34 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 55. Of course! Entirely believable! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 07:01 PM Response to Reply #55 |
| 62. Which part? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 70. Well, now, the French are strange but not that strange... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #70 |
| 86. Lol |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Tue May-17-11 07:30 AM Response to Reply #86 |
| 90. The French touch is just so precious. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| monmouth
|
Mon May-16-11 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Ensign must be grateful for this little breather..LOL....n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| muriel_volestrangler
|
Mon May-16-11 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. You'd think as straight-forward an alibi as that would have already been checked by the police |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ghost Dog
|
Mon May-16-11 06:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 58. Yes, the alleged time of attack appears to have been changed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bragi
|
Mon May-16-11 07:43 PM Response to Reply #58 |
| 75. Tin foil hat now humming like a drone /nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| w4rma
|
Mon May-16-11 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. This is going to get crazy. Assuming there is a frame up, I hope it gets completely exposed. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bragi
|
Mon May-16-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 15. Maybe it's a case of overzealous arraignment syndrome /nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aquart
|
Mon May-16-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 20. But who is framing whom? And why? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HankyDubs
|
Mon May-16-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 28. Thom Hartmann suggested today |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| makhno
|
Mon May-16-11 04:24 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 30. DSK is without doubt an entitled douche the PS could do without |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 06:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 57. Clooney? I'm sorry, I just don't get this. What in the world are you talking about? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| makhno
|
Mon May-16-11 07:01 PM Response to Reply #57 |
| 61. See #20 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Mon May-16-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #61 |
| 63. Well, I am relieved! Thanks. I had bad thoughts... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| makhno
|
Mon May-16-11 06:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 60. Self-delete |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren Stupidity
|
Mon May-16-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 34. uh - he was the leading candidate for president of france. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| truthisfreedom
|
Mon May-16-11 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. I wonder if they used his cell phone to track him. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MrsBrady
|
Mon May-16-11 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. let's see how the evidence plays out |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| izquierdista
|
Mon May-16-11 05:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 42. Picked a public figure out of a lineup.........hmmmm |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 44. It's simpler than that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MrsBrady
|
Mon May-16-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 80. um...i had never seen a picture of him before the news broke |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #80 |
| 87. How many of the last couple of days did you clean his room? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MrsBrady
|
Mon May-16-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #87 |
| 88. well, it works both ways |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SoapBox
|
Mon May-16-11 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. But supposedly, the maid was taken to the hospital with minor injuries... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 26. "So did she do those herself?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JVS
|
Mon May-16-11 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. Does this mean that some fiend was impersonating him and sexually assaulted a woman? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren Stupidity
|
Mon May-16-11 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. If this holds up it would be a most interesting development. nt. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JI7
|
Mon May-16-11 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. but wouldn't something like this be something that would be known earlier |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sufrommich
|
Mon May-16-11 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. This should be easy enough to prove if true. The restaurant |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 46. It's not a Motel 6 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sufrommich
|
Mon May-16-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 50. Check out time is 12 pm according to their web page. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 52. Yeah and.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sufrommich
|
Mon May-16-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 53. I didn't say they did. I was actually saying that a restaurant alibi |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 06:00 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 54. Agree |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LisaL
|
Mon May-16-11 07:05 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 65. It's a hotel. There should be a video of when he left. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #65 |
| 69. It's a hotel of a very well connected French company, too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alcibiades_mystery
|
Mon May-16-11 08:04 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 78. ROFL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gin
|
Mon May-16-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 47. just heard he gave an interview a week or so ago and mentioned |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lars39
|
Mon May-16-11 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 51. Conviction or no, he's gone as chief of the IMF. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| canetoad
|
Mon May-16-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 59. Story from 2007 emerges |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Odin2005
|
Mon May-16-11 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 72. Of course, you don't think a member of the Elites will allow themselves to be convicted, do you? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Prometheus Bound
|
Mon May-16-11 08:42 PM Response to Reply #72 |
| 84. No, I don't. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Mon May-16-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #72 |
| 89. Hey, he was denied bail |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Tue May-17-11 08:52 AM Response to Reply #89 |
| 92. Love the fact that the judge was a woman... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jberryhill
|
Tue May-17-11 09:06 AM Response to Reply #92 |
| 93. I doubt that has anything to do with it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CTyankee
|
Tue May-17-11 09:10 AM Response to Reply #93 |
| 94. You miss my point. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 24th 2026, 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC