|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:40 PM Original message |
Ed Schultz Suspended for ‘Slut’ Comment directed at Laura Ingraham |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. As a woman, I don't like Laura Ingram |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. go take a time out! Meanwhile, DrugRush and friends never get suspended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newfie11
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
60. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
64. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. woops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
114. So MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 07:49 AM Response to Reply #114 |
123. I don't think Democrats have to be better. Let's just hold everyone accountable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 07:54 AM Response to Reply #123 |
125. My point is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip_In_Boulder
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 10:16 AM Response to Reply #3 |
133. Not to mention that Rush et al |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. He called her a slut and then revised with "Talk Slut." That's pretty close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yes of course she is a right winger and a tool of the big corporations.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indy legend
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
98. I have another name for her but I'm sure you wouldn't like it either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 07:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
120. Well, I've called Christiane Amanpour the "Scud Slut" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #4 |
124. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAnthony
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
146. Not by how I define that S word...That word was OK to be used on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. Laura Ingraham is a useless sack of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Sad to see but not unexpected with the COMCAST..take over. Expect to see More.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. This has nothing to do with Comcast - this was the right decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Really? Why would you say that? Please give me your view of this.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:02 AM Response to Reply #24 |
126. Sexist language denigrates all women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 09:36 AM Response to Reply #126 |
130. Even if it isn't directed at a woman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:04 PM Response to Reply #126 |
143. Every time I turn on my Time Warner Cable Basic...I see denigration of Women...I see foul language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:08 PM Response to Reply #143 |
144. Edited for more "comprehensive language." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #20 |
83. Now, vile would have been a good choice of words for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
28. Thom Hartmann is self employed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwooldri
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
101. As is Mike Malloy and Ed Schultz. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip_In_Boulder
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #8 |
134. And you can always count on Democrats to help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #134 |
147. The sad thing is what you say seems to be true as it plays out in these years since Bush II. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. BTW: There are many who don't like Ed Schultz who will be applauding this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
10. Deleted message |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I disagree completely with your characterization of Rachel Maddow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. Rachel's cool! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 07:46 AM Response to Reply #25 |
122. The opposite of "wimp" is "balls?" On a thread about sexist language? Corporate whores? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 10:40 AM Response to Reply #122 |
135. Yes, my post was tongue-in-cheek |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. "they" will work their way throughout the whole spectrum..."Under the Bus." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. "She's so childish that she acts like a three-year-old flirting with daddy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
46. The misogyny is thick in here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
48. That's an interesting view of Rachel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
53. That was some hateful shit. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
59. I dislike pretty much all cable "news." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:00 PM Response to Reply #59 |
148. Thank you for this post...it speaks truth that folks cover their ears not to hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
82. why do you think that your being a woman gives you a pass to use sexist language? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
92. You offend me. Jeebus. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDemGrrl
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
97. I believe your are off the mark on Rachel Maddow - she is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #97 |
102. +1 agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #97 |
149. Rachel is Smart and Wonderful...but represents a "Niche" Market. Ed Represents Labor...a NO! NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Veracious
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
105. nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. Deleted message |
panader0
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. I had the misfortune of seeing some photos of her nude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Deleted message |
TheEuclideanOne
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. First Ed....Then You..... You can both go to hell! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:11 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. "She's no paragon of virtue". Most women aren't. This is the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
84. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Nexus
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
47. I think that was Dr. Laura, not Laura Ingraham nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
54. So what if she's not? None of us are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
86. Remember When Dr. Laura's Nude Photos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #13 |
150. DISGUSTING...I hope Mods Delete your post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
14. I like Ed fine but calling any woman slut is unacceptable & sexist. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. As an "Old School Feminist" in the tradition of Gloria Steinham...if he called her a SLUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
51. "Gloria Steinham " would never call a woman a "slut" for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bravo Zulu
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. I hope this suspension is over by 10PM, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
18. Good. That was wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bubba Kush
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
19. Unsuspend Ed Schultz at once, MSNBC - he's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
naaman fletcher
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
22. I think this sucks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
27. I can't believe anyone would criticize this decision - it was both smart and the right one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
41. A right-winger in the same position... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
152. It was the wrong decision. Even Oprah's Media followers called women and men Sluts...Sluts is like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
29. Remarks of this nature are acceptable and will be tolerated, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #29 |
50. "Bill O'Reilly Not Suspended for ‘Baby Killer' Comment directed at Dr. George Tiller" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
31. It happens. His words were chosen poorly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. What is YOUR definition of "SLUT?" Let's look at the behavior of the IMF Chief.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
49. Bit of difference between what is being described. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarPoint
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
32. Memorial Day Holiday is approaching... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
33. Ed should have called Laura a bastard. No sexism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. He would have had to prove she was "Born out of Wedlock" to use that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anakin Skywalker
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
34. Umm...maybe she is? We care too much about politeness when they haven't been that towards us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. They have made blatent death threats against us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Nexus
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:21 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. I kinda agree. Because it's war. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. Seriously... Where has been the "Politically Correct Kindness" thrown Dems or Progressives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:16 AM Response to Reply #34 |
116. Maybe we care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
39. Oh CRAP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Ahh...but that's the point.. "Ed Needs to Be More Careful in the Future." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:53 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. That's the standard we want to live down to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
77. No...it's what says seeing what those beneath us get away with that allows us to defend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 05:27 PM Response to Reply #77 |
141. BTW...Donna Brazille and Tony Blankley were on CNN, talking about Ed Schultz. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:17 AM Response to Reply #52 |
117. Exactly right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedigger
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
43. It was certainly a poor choice of words, with predictable blowback. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
85. I am not completely comfortable with MSNBC taking action over his comments on his radio show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
44. ** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
45. Ought to be different contexts to the word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellenfl
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:17 PM Response to Reply #45 |
62. we were a small group of female friends and called ourselves 'slut puppies'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rozlee
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #62 |
88. It also depends on the user's intentions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellenfl
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:19 AM Response to Reply #88 |
127. you said it better, but that is my point, also. i only ever used the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 12:51 PM Response to Reply #127 |
136. I believe the male word for slut is womanizer, what a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
55. comment was right - and fits what she does = her mouth says a lot of sh....t about a lot of things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
56. Cue Mama Steph's mooks and the Ingrahasm. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boomerbust
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
57. "Laura you ignorant slut" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
58. As usual, MSNBC's punishment doesn't fit the crime. Suspension from his radio show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denverbill
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
61. All right-wingers are sluts. They'd do anything for enough money. He's 100% correct. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mimi85
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. Have to agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
63. I Heard It and Knew There'd Be Repercussions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dirigo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. Laura May Well Be Widely Thought Of As A Partisan Political Hag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:57 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. Don't See Laura Changing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
66. Does MSNBC run his radio show too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwooldri
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #66 |
91. AFAIK Ed runs his own radio show. Dial Global syndicates it for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #91 |
132. Ah -- gotcha - I was just reading up on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
69. Like Ed generally. Can't get behind "slut." No place for that term in reasonable discourse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
70. Unlike Fox News, MSNBC actually has rules and enforces them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blackspade
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
71. oops! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mira
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
72. Ed, Ed, Ed, you know better - you don't always have to be so precise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:56 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. that`s part of ed`s problem...he gets to down home sometimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
73. i noticed he was going over the top yesterday ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:03 PM Response to Reply #73 |
79. Does the RW Media ever take...."A Time Out?" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
W T F
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
76. He should have taken the Glenn Beck approach......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
78. He's apologizing on air right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:03 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Good that the "Left" does the cave in...it's expected. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
irisblue
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #78 |
94. i watched his apology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #94 |
99. So do I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #78 |
103. NO< ED, NOOOO!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eablair3
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
81. Maybe CurrentTV can hire Ed Schultz (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #81 |
90. Yeah, I was hoping Ed would say he was leaving MSNBC. Then go to Current TV! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Nexus
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:28 PM Response to Reply #90 |
106. I say Ed should go strictly satalite radio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Fri May-27-11 01:18 PM Response to Reply #90 |
157. just a quick question not related to subject but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabear
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
87. The suspension is appropriate. His apology is appropriate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBHagman
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #87 |
107. Great post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annm4peace
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
89. No way. I thought he had done something really bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
93. Oh course Palin had to stick her hateful nose into the situation .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 04:51 AM Response to Reply #93 |
112. of course she had no problem with Beck and Rush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ctsnowman
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
95. Ed was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
96. I just saw his on the air apology, and I think he went too far. He made it sound like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
100. I'm a huge fan of Schultz -- why in the heck would he have done THAT????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
russspeakeasy
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
104. What should he have called her? I can think of worse things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
108. I agree with a suspension |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redford
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 07:44 AM Response to Reply #108 |
121. That is exactly what I was thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
109. It's MSNBC, nothing new for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed May-25-11 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
110. Deleted message |
robcon
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 05:02 AM Response to Reply #110 |
113. She's neither a bitch nor a slut. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-27-11 12:03 AM Response to Reply #113 |
156. Deleted message |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #110 |
138. "You don't fight with honor!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurrayDelph
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
111. I think MSNBC should use this as "a teaching moment" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #111 |
137. Ed's apology seemed extremely sincere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Fri May-27-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #137 |
158. yea me too, something really must have ticked him off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:14 AM Response to Original message |
115. His apology was quite acceptable as far as I'm concerned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
118. Good. Totally uncalled for term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
119. As Ed said in his apology, his remaks were "vile." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:50 AM Response to Reply #119 |
128. I do too, I suspect this is something Ed won't do again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
129. The suspension is justified. I just wish right-wing TV and radio would follow MSNBC's lead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
131. could someone just explain to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #131 |
139. Read the info on the link below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Fri May-27-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #139 |
159. thanks the only thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 01:50 PM Response to Reply #131 |
140. This is what I found while searching this subject: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
142. This must be what all the "slut" threads are about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #142 |
145. Sadly it's a campaign to throw Ed Schutz "Under the Bus" with Kucinich, Greenwald, Hedges, Swansen, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #145 |
151. Paranoid rant, IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #151 |
153. Hey "robcon" ...not paranoid...but truthy... Been here long as you...not weird or outta it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:18 PM Response to Reply #153 |
154. Not a word of truth (or truthiness) in what you wrote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu May-26-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #154 |
155. Across the aisle, robcon...makes us both feel better. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeglow3
![]() |
Fri May-27-11 01:45 PM Response to Reply #142 |
160. Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own A Television |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC