|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| alp227
|
Sat Oct-29-11 02:55 PM Original message |
| (Jackie Speier) Congresswoman to live off food stamps budget |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cutlassmama
|
Sat Oct-29-11 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. the only way to eat healthy on that amount is to dumpster dive behind |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| valerief
|
Sat Oct-29-11 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Well, that's one way to diet. She should try it for at least a month, though, to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| meow2u3
|
Sat Oct-29-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 20. One way to diet my eye! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Remember Me
|
Sun Oct-30-11 12:02 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 29. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KurtNYC
|
Tue Nov-01-11 09:15 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 83. Pasta e fagioli |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| legin
|
Mon Oct-31-11 07:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 41. Exactly right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| former9thward
|
Sat Oct-29-11 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. It should be closer to $7 a day. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Oct-31-11 07:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 43. Please. In someone's imagination, it may be $7.00 a day. In reality, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| plumbob
|
Sat Oct-29-11 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Five entire whole complete days? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheDebbieDee
|
Sun Oct-30-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 38. Well, I'll give her credit for TRYING it! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| appleannie1
|
Sat Oct-29-11 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. I don't think five days is long enough to grasp the full scope of how paltry that amount really is. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| w0nderer
|
Sun Oct-30-11 10:15 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 28. not to mention - clean out fridge, freezer, pantry n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bennyboy
|
Sat Oct-29-11 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. CA 200 in Food Stamps for thirty days.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Turbineguy
|
Sat Oct-29-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. No doubt Fox News will show her eating |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jwirr
|
Sat Oct-29-11 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Back when George McGovern was fighting for the food stamp |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| provis99
|
Sat Oct-29-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. I'd rather see every republican in congress do this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Marazinia
|
Sat Oct-29-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. Another crime to lay at the feet of our corporations |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bread_and_roses
|
Sat Oct-29-11 05:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Excellent point - except possibly the tax reduction ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Marazinia
|
Sat Oct-29-11 07:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 17. True |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alp227
|
Sat Oct-29-11 05:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. The free market had its chance and FAILED to create a living wage nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Marazinia
|
Sat Oct-29-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 19. Yes it has |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kpete
|
Sat Oct-29-11 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Congresswoman to live off food stamps budget |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KamaAina
|
Sat Oct-29-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 14. Speier is one of the really good ones |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| avaistheone1
|
Wed Nov-02-11 09:50 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 93. I like Jackie. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Systematic Chaos
|
Sat Oct-29-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. It will be a basic diet, but it can be done easily enough. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eilen
|
Sun Oct-30-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 32. Prices have gone up. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| plumbob
|
Mon Oct-31-11 07:19 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 42. Here in west Texas, prices are much higher than that. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Oct-31-11 07:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 44. Three pounds of potatoes for $1 is not even near a good sale price in my area. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CAcyclist
|
Mon Oct-31-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 69. Prices in California are triple where you are |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Le Taz Hot
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:17 AM Response to Reply #69 |
| 73. Actually, the prices in the Central Valley |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gormy Cuss
|
Tue Nov-01-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #73 |
| 88. But Speier lives in the SF Bay area and prices are much, much higher here. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Donnachaidh
|
Sat Oct-29-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 16. 5 DAYS? Meh. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Systematic Chaos
|
Sat Oct-29-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 21. I didn't notice the 5 day part. Thought it would be longer. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Puzzledtraveller
|
Sat Oct-29-11 11:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 25. Food stamp worker going on 3 years |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Oct-31-11 08:07 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 47. Stil, there is an amount per per person that is deemed necessary for food. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jmowreader
|
Sat Oct-29-11 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. You can do it... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| geomon666
|
Sat Oct-29-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. Top Ramen baby |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sabriel
|
Sat Oct-29-11 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. 5 days? Not long enough to develop nutritional deficiencies |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Oct-31-11 08:12 AM Response to Reply #23 |
| 48. Or to get dead bored with potatoes, rice, pasta and dried beans and lentils, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Posteritatis
|
Sat Oct-29-11 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. Do it for five months and then I'll be impressed. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cal Carpenter
|
Sat Oct-29-11 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. This patronizing experiment is a joke |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kestrel91316
|
Sun Oct-30-11 01:30 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 30. Nobody lives on food stamps or food bank boxes "for years". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cal Carpenter
|
Sun Oct-30-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 35. I have direct knowledge about this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kestrel91316
|
Sun Oct-30-11 07:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 37. I guess I'm out of the loop. I thought there was a lifetime limit of one year |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gormy Cuss
|
Tue Nov-01-11 02:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 89. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Oct-31-11 08:14 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 49. Edited. When I read Cal's post, I realized my post was duplicative--and his or hers was better. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LanternWaste
|
Mon Oct-31-11 07:46 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 46. I don't think bringing greater awareness to a problem is a joke. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Oct-31-11 08:20 AM Response to Reply #46 |
| 50. Bringing greater awareness is not a joke. Implying 5 days is in the same universe as long enough |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cal Carpenter
|
Mon Oct-31-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 63. Anyone who thinks living off food stamps is an easy or comfortable or even adequate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CreekDog
|
Mon Oct-31-11 11:36 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 55. doesn't seem to be good enough for you |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cal Carpenter
|
Mon Oct-31-11 04:11 PM Response to Reply #55 |
| 65. Are the people who live off food stamps |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CreekDog
|
Mon Oct-31-11 04:30 PM Response to Reply #65 |
| 66. yes they are |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:17 AM Response to Reply #66 |
| 72. Fair to view her as heroic for other reasons, but not for eating for 5 days on a low budget. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CreekDog
|
Tue Nov-01-11 08:14 AM Response to Reply #72 |
| 80. i agree |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Le Taz Hot
|
Sun Oct-30-11 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
| 27. I understand the point |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kestrel91316
|
Sun Oct-30-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 31. Great ideas. I've said it all myself. But you've really stepped in it now, lol. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wickerwoman
|
Sun Oct-30-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 36. +100 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Enrique
|
Mon Oct-31-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 68. it drives me nuts when people suggest living on Ramen noodles |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Oct-31-11 08:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 51. I think what most of us are taking exception to is the implication that five days |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Le Taz Hot
|
Mon Oct-31-11 09:48 AM Response to Reply #51 |
| 52. Oh I know I come off |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:15 AM Response to Reply #52 |
| 71. I didn't think you came off as self righteous AT ALL. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KamaAina
|
Mon Oct-31-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 67. Well, you have time to cook |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Le Taz Hot
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:08 AM Response to Reply #67 |
| 70. I have 3 adults, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tsiyu
|
Tue Nov-01-11 09:13 AM Response to Reply #70 |
| 82. I agree with a lot of what you're saying |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Le Taz Hot
|
Tue Nov-01-11 09:27 AM Response to Reply #82 |
| 84. I think I've acknowledged that not all people |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tsiyu
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:15 PM Response to Reply #84 |
| 90. Sorry if you took that personally |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Le Taz Hot
|
Wed Nov-02-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #90 |
| 91. LOL! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| PavePusher
|
Sun Oct-30-11 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. 5 days? 5 FUCKING DAYS?!?! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lsewpershad
|
Sun Oct-30-11 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. Who is she trying to fool? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CreekDog
|
Mon Oct-31-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 57. wow from your tone, you make it sound like she's commited some crime against humanity |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| totodeinhere
|
Mon Oct-31-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #57 |
| 58. Why is she only doing it for five days? If she is really serious about making a point, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CreekDog
|
Mon Oct-31-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #58 |
| 59. that's her decision --why don't you ask her |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| totodeinhere
|
Mon Oct-31-11 12:33 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 61. Since you are defending her I wanted to know your opinion on why she is only |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CreekDog
|
Mon Oct-31-11 01:20 PM Response to Reply #61 |
| 62. Okay, here's a guess: my church encouraged us to try this too --for 1 week |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| totodeinhere
|
Mon Oct-31-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 64. Fair enough. Thanks. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NuttyFluffers
|
Sun Oct-30-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. just for 5 days is a crash diet. go at least 2 months and then talk. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Marrah_G
|
Sun Oct-30-11 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. 5 days is nothing, honestly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Oct-31-11 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
| 45. Five days? ZZZZzzzzzzzzz. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hotler
|
Wed Nov-02-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #45 |
| 92. +1 n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlueIris
|
Mon Oct-31-11 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 53. Our (former) governor tried that once, I believe. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:20 AM Response to Reply #53 |
| 75. For five days? Sure it is. People survive on bugs and sucking moisture out of plants for longer. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LeftishBrit
|
Mon Oct-31-11 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 54. I think all politicians should have to do something like that. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:21 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 76. Doing that for only five days makes it seem a lot easier than living that way is, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Roland99
|
Mon Oct-31-11 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 56. 4 eggs at each meal and a couple of cans of green beans |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:25 AM Response to Reply #56 |
| 77. For five days, maybe. No one can do that for a lifetime, though. If they didn't die of |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ship of Fools
|
Mon Oct-31-11 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 60. I think this is good. She had no problem |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| snooper2
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 74. Nanners at 39 cents a pound, rice, soups, lettuce, ground beef, hamburger helper |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:29 AM Response to Reply #74 |
| 78. Bananas at 39 cents a lb? Not in Boston, not since Hoover was POTUS, anyway. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| snooper2
|
Tue Nov-01-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #78 |
| 86. You should find yourself an Aldi |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Tue Nov-01-11 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 79. As long as this thread is turning into more of a how to than a comment on |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| closeupready
|
Tue Nov-01-11 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
| 81. That's doable, IMHO. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mopinko
|
Tue Nov-01-11 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 85. several other members of the progressive caucus are doing this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Islandlife
|
Tue Nov-01-11 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 87. Most of my friends who use food stamps use them to supplement their |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Feb 19th 2026, 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC