.. Bush said free trade is "so important," and "that's why we better be careful about rhetoric that begins to unwind a free trade agreement that is making an enormous difference in the lifestyles of people in Mexico."
Enormous difference in lifestyles? Yeah. The rich get richer, the tiny "middle class" lives on credit cards, and the poor get poorer. Many people from Chiapas and Oaxaca migrate to the north of Mexico with their families to pick vegetables, and make roughly $18 in a 10 to 12 hour day of constant labor. And this is considered good money. Middle class? Maybe Bu$h should visit someplace in Mexico other than downtown Cancun sometime. But from talking to the people down here, Mexican folks pretty much universally despise him, so maybe that wouldn't be such a good idea.
Discover Mexico: Facts and Figures
Geographic / Demographic Data (Updated 2004)
Minimum Daily Wage: There are 3 'zones'; Provincial, Mexico City and Tourist Areas. The average daily wage in Mexico is currently MX$45 a day.
http://www.mexperience.com/discover/discov_ff.htm
45 pesos a day is the average daily wage? 45 pesos a day equals:
Live mid-market rates as of 2004.08.07 19:47:44 GMT.
45.00 MXN Mexico Pesos = 3.94685 USD United States Dollars
http://www.mexperience.com/guide/essentials/exchange.htm
Wow. These folks are getting rich! Less than $4 US per day. Yuh. That's middle class wages to Bu$h?
Trade Brings Riches, but Not to Mexico's Poor
NAFTA's Critics Say Pact Has Failed to Improve Lives of Impoverished
Washington Post
March 22, 2003
By Mary Jordan and Kevin Sullivan
MEXICO CITY -- Irma Osorio Soriano crouched on the muddy ground outside her shack washing dishes in soapless gray water. A dreamy look came into her eyes as she imagined the luxurious trappings she doubts she will ever afford: "A refrigerator and a TV," she said, scrubbing in hard circles. "And a big radio."
snip---------
While the percentage of poor Mexicans is about the same now as it was in the early 1980s -- a little more than 50 percent -- the population has grown over the same period, from 70 million to 100 million.
That means about 19 million more Mexicans are living in poverty than 20 years ago, according to the Mexican government and international organizations. About 24 million -- nearly one in every four Mexicans -- are classified as extremely poor and unable to afford adequate food.
snip----
But what has become painfully clear in Mexico is that free trade -- most famously NAFTA -- has failed to lift the country out of poverty.
http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/ftaa/625.html
The problems with NAFTA and the Mexican Underclass
In order for NAFTA to be initiated, Mexico must comply with Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs). SAPs allow countries to be eligible for loans from the World Bank. The problem with SAPs in relation to the Zapatistans are that it calls for the privatization of all land (oil, mining, telephone service, etc..), deep cuts in social spending, (health, education, housing), and an emphasis on export production (eliminates nearly all loans for those in the sectors producing goods for internal consumption).
Deep cuts in social spending is yet another detriment to Mexico's indigenous people. It will close schools and minimize the availability of medical attention. As it stands now 46.6% of Chiapas' population suffers from malnutrition compared to 5.5% for the rest of the country.
The privatization of all land will have a dramatic effect on the Zapatistas. Previously the Mexican constitution protected the communal lands (ejidos) held by the indigenous population. In the state of Chiapas (70% indigenous population) this will lead to the expulsion of 1.5 million people from their land. Not only will these people lose their land, but it will suffer irresponsible rates of deforestation. The EZLN feels that the theft of their land is an attempt to destroy the culture of the Mayans (assimilation).
The shift to an emphasis on export goods will greatly effect middle and low class farmers in Mexico. Since it is mainly middle and low class farmers who specialize in the production of internal goods, the drastic cuts in loans available to them will lead to wide spread bankruptcy and loss of traditional jobs. Free Trade also eliminates subsidies from the government in areas of financial and technological aid. Perhaps the clearest example of the effects of export concentration would be the situation of corn farmers. Corn has traditionally been a symbol associated with the ancient Aztecs and Mayans. But now it is being imported to Mexico to compete with corn produced internally. This imported corn from the North is cheaply priced which causes the price of corn to be driven down, thus limiting a major source of cash income for the indigenous farmers. One solution for this problem has been proposed by the Indigenous People's Alliance (IPP). The IPP is seeking to created their own Indigenous Free Trade Agreement which will allow Mayans from Mexico to trade with Mohawks, Pueblo Indians, Chicanos, and others in North and South America. This concept emphasizes cooperation not competition and will seek to reestablish the ways in which Indians used to trade.
All of these situations will inevitably cause illegal immigration to the U.S......
http://www.providence.edu/polisci/students/zapatistas/nafta.html
Maybe Bu$h should explain how NAFTA is helping the people of Mexico. What data does he base his statements on?
Oh, yeah, I forgot....his administration just makes up data.