http://onlypill.tripod.com/zarathustra/id14.htmlWe are inundated with market manipulation and conspiracy theories. I will attempt a logical inquiry into this phenomenon. For a good lesson in information manipulation, your best bet is to go to the stock market. Lest you think that Marty Schwartz is an isolated case, read the Ray Dirk’s story. Therefore, I shall confine my study to the commodities markets. The commodities markets are the oldest markets in the world. The various commodities provide significant amounts of data for analysis. If effective manipulation exists, one will be able to track its effects. We will define successful manipulation as having interfered with a commodity’s ability to exhibit the normal accumulation, distribution, and trending zones. This creates an objective benchmark for this inquiry.
Any discussion of market manipulation must be reduced into the elements that might create the belief in the phenomenon. We must first deal with our need to believe in market manipulation. Since actual evidence of market manipulation is sparse, what is generating this tendency to suspect manipulation, or conspiracy? We must further define the process to differentiate between the attempt to manipulate the markets, and the actual manipulation of the markets. A further distinction is necessary. One must distinguish between those processes that are manipulatable, and those processes that are not manipulatable. For example, political and social processes are manipulatatble, and may be nothing more than manipulation, coercion, and conspiracy. Physical processes are subject to the laws of nature, and any attempt to successfully manipulate these processes are possible only by complying with the physical laws involved. One could be found in the position of claiming the laws of nature manipulate the markets. This forces us to examine the true nature of markets. Are they controlled by man, or some bigger force? The final question is the definition of market manipulation. Are we speaking of the intra day price action, or daily price action? The weekly and monthly price charts will show a different picture. Trading ranges behave differently than trending markets.
Do we have a tendency to believe in manipulation, and conspiracies? The answer is yes! The social world we inhabit reveals attempts to coerce, manipulate, and regulate in every facet of social interaction. The attempt to control outcomes to our benefit is part of our survival mechanism. It is indisputable part of existence in a society. However, this does not prove that these conspiratorial efforts are effective in manipulating markets. Aesop once said, "And the mice voted to bell the cat". Many activities are beyond the power of social pressure. The laws and pretensions of humanity are just foolishness when confronted with power of nature. Therefore, any intelligent discussion of market manipulation must properly differentiate between social creations, and those phenomenon that are based on physical reality and it’s laws. A steel mill would be an example of a process that is indifferent to the schemes of society. The only way to increase output is to increase the inputs, or evolve a new technology that requires a complete understanding of the principles of metallurgy. Wishing, hoping, dreaming, and screaming are irrelevant. Social activities and politics are the domains of emotions and perception manipulation, not the commodities markets! Again, J. L. Livermore has anticipated our question. Livermore said, "I sometimes think that speculation must be an unnatural sort of business, because I find that the average speculator has arrayed against him his own nature. The weaknesses that all men are prone to are fatal in success in speculation- usually those very weaknesses that make him likable to his fellows or that he himself particularly guards against in those other ventures of his where they are not so dangerous as when he is trading in stocks or commodities."
The most important facet of market manipulation is the manipulation of information about the market. This is the rock that sinks most investor’s ships. George Soros made an interesting observation about market information.. He said, "Economic history is a never-ending series of episodes based on falsehoods and lies, not truth. It represents the path to big money. The object is to recognize the trend whose premise is false, ride that trend, and step off before it is discredited." This observation comes from the greatest currency trader alive. I believe that he has thrown down the gauntlet regarding the value of the information you receive. Does market manipulation exist, or is it merely the lies and deceptions about markets that are the manipulation? George Soros has shared his experience. Leo Melamed, the founder of the International Monetary Market (Chicago Mercantile Exchange), gave a speech. In this speech, Futures, the Coveted Scapegoat, he said, " Derogatory comments, defamatory innuendos, inflammatory jokes, false accusations, misleading opinions, half-truths, out-and-out lies, that is the fate and burden of futures markets. Thus it has been throughout time, thus it will no doubt continue. And why not? From time immemorial, predicting the future has been a hazardous occupation."
more...