|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| kskiska
|
Sat Sep-04-04 10:59 PM Original message |
| NYT: How 'Flex Time' Became a Republican Idea |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DebJ
|
Sat Sep-04-04 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. and it's amazing how flex-time employers forget or deny that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The_Casual_Observer
|
Sat Sep-04-04 11:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. I get the "I'll make it up to you " all the time |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DebJ
|
Sat Sep-04-04 11:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. slave labor, pure and simple. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kool Kitty
|
Sat Sep-04-04 11:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. Exactly. It goes hand-in-hand with the change |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| oneighty
|
Sun Sep-05-04 09:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 11. Yes indeed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DBoon
|
Sun Sep-05-04 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. It's only flexible for the employer |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JCMach1
|
Sun Sep-05-04 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. Not really FLEXtime... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jdj
|
Sun Sep-05-04 01:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. yes, thank you, the C word. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ixion
|
Sun Sep-05-04 04:38 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. yep, that was my thought as well... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Eloriel
|
Sun Sep-05-04 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. Looks like a Good article |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hotler
|
Sun Sep-05-04 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. Baby steps toward the way labor was in the 1880's. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LiberalFighter
|
Sun Sep-05-04 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. The key word is "allow" not "require" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| struggle4progress
|
Sun Sep-05-04 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. kick for yet another plan to screw ordinary workers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ploppy
|
Mon Sep-06-04 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. That is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TankLV
|
Mon Sep-06-04 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. I had an employer than wanted me to only total my hours to 40 per week |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clovis Sangrail
|
Mon Sep-06-04 05:43 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 16. salaried vs. hourly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 0007
|
Mon Sep-06-04 06:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. In other words the Labor Laws have been trashed by junior and his thugs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Radius
|
Mon Sep-06-04 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. Salary vs. Hourly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 14th 2026, 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC