|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
|
| midnight
|
Mon Dec-20-10 11:32 AM Original message |
| Congress approved $801 billion for millionaires, & $57 billion for unemployed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| niceypoo
|
Mon Dec-20-10 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. It is an abandonment of fiscal responsibility |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ladjf
|
Mon Dec-20-10 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Such a deal! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheWraith
|
Mon Dec-20-10 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Those figures are complete lies. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| midnight
|
Tue Dec-21-10 10:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. I sure hope these figures are wrong.... Can you show me why? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Recursion
|
Mon Dec-20-10 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Where do you get $800 billion "for millionaires"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pnorman
|
Mon Dec-20-10 12:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. I'm unrecommending this thread, for what appers to be a false assertion in behalf of |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Still a Democrat
|
Mon Dec-20-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. You beat me to it - the $800B for millionaires is wrong, if facts matter to the OP n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| midnight
|
Tue Dec-21-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. Please correct me if I'm wrong with the facts... Thank you. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| midnight
|
Tue Dec-21-10 10:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. Sorry that this news appears so distressing that it gets lumped into anti-Obama. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pnorman
|
Tue Dec-21-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. The main problem is your "numbers", which have been challenged outright |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| midnight
|
Tue Dec-21-10 01:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Can you please post one of those so I can be better informed? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pnorman
|
Tue Dec-21-10 01:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 13. This doesn't warrant a serious response! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| midnight
|
Tue Dec-21-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 12. Can you please show me where you think the bulk of the tax |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| movingviolation
|
Tue Dec-21-10 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. "Socialism for the rich |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JohnWxy
|
Tue Dec-21-10 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. Hey! hey! Don't be so critical, you're in danger of being considered a heretic!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Feb 11th 2026, 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC