All but Fox attack Fahrenheit 9/11 - Why?

[Sticky]

-snip-
NBC ran highly negative assessments of the film on both its Nightly News and its cable channel MSNBC. The network referred to its coverage as a "truth squad report." As part of this exposé, senior correspondent Lisa Myers targeted the hilarious moment in Fahrenheit 9/11 when Moore asks legislators to sign up their children to fight in Iraq. Myers noted that Moore had failed to include comments by Republican congressmember Mark Kennedy, who appears in that scene looking baffled. "My nephew had just gotten called into service and was told he's heading for Afghanistan," Kennedy told Myers. "He didn't like that answer, so he didn't include it." Moore had addressed this allegation in the Stephanopoulos interview: "When we interviewed , he didn't have any family members in Afghanistan. . . . We released the transcript and put it on our website." But NBC made no mention of these readily available rebuttals. (A network spokesman declined to comment.)

Note that none of the facts in Fahrenheit 9/11 are in dispute. What ABC and NBC called into question is Moore's extrapolation and interpretation of information; in other words, his slant. But by using loaded phrases like "truth squad" and "fact or fiction," and by omitting Moore's answers to key questions, these networks did the very thing they accuse him of doing. I would argue that this sort of distortion is far more dangerous in the context of a news broadcast than in a clearly opinionated film.

Why did NBC and ABC take the administration's line? Well, NBC is owned by General Electric, a prime defense contractor. ABC is owned by Disney, which has no need of Pentagon largesse—but Disney is dependent on the kindness of federal regulators, and to the Bush administration those mouse ears have a lot to answer for. After all, it was Disney subsidiary Miramax that initially planned to distribute Fahrenheit 9/11, and even after the studio pulled out under pressure from the parent company, Miramax chief Harvey Weinstein formed a consortium of companies to release the film. Last Thursday's Wall Street Journal reported that Disney may sever its ties with Miramax next year. With its theme parks under siege for allowing desecrations of family values, such as Gay Day, Disney has much to gain by joining the attack on Moore's movie, which is regarded in certain congregations as the Great R-Rated Satan.

But how to account for Fox's relatively merciful coverage (or the exceedingly odd editorial in Monday's New York Post defending Moore from the Federal Election Commission's attempt to muzzle his ads)? Here's my explanation: Rupert Murdoch is covering his ass in case John Kerry wins. For that matter.....
Read the entire article:
http://villagevoice.com/issues/0426/goldstein.php

[PROGRESSIVE1]

1. But see how CBS didn't attack it!!!

Gee ABC and NBC "Defense Contractor TV" seem to have a problem with the First Amendment.

[Parche]

2. Lisa Meyers

I cant stand her, ever watch her on the news, she is all over the
TV, she cant keep still, she is waivering and going back and forth
like she has ants in her pants.

[TexasBushwhacker]

3. But Disney has Disneyworld in Florida ....

Bubba Jeb's state, AND the state of Florida pension fund own 10% of Disney's stock, so if Florida wants to play hardball on Dubya's behalf, the mudslinging is via ABC.

[PROGRESSIVE1]

4. I HATE ABC!!! I HATE THEIR STUPID SHOWS!!!!

ABC has NEVER made sitcom I could stand to watch!!! Their news SUCKS!!!

I would love to see ABC shutdown!!!

:grr:

God Bless CBS, BBC, CBC!!!

[TommyO]

5. Possible explanation:

Even a fair-and-balanced clock is right twice a day (once if using a 24-hour clock).

[Sticky]

6. This article

makes them all look very unprofessional. They play with the news like it's a game of chess and go with whatever strategy will gain them favour or ratings,

It's a scary time right now.