|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Homer12
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:02 PM Original message |
Against Gay Marriage - The Religious Right are Bigots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats unite
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's not just right wing nuts.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_ashley
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. the Bible teaches.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. The bible teaches that a lot of things are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_ashley
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. list some examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Eating shellfish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_ashley
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. i believe you are referring to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfwitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. How many Jews do you know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_ashley
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. i didn't say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Saul, the terrorist of Tarsus? Who gives a flying f*** what he said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_ashley
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. show me the verse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Mark 14:52 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfwitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 05:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Welcome to DU Mike!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 05:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greekspeak
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 02:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
120. Also to be found in Secret Mark, which sheds light on 14:52 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
45. not what it says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemperEadem
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
77. Paul! Ha! The biggest mysogynist that ever lived, next to John Knox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
110. But these idiotic "laws" are in the exact same place in the bible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greekspeak
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 02:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
119. The only clear injunction against man/man sex is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfwitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. examples... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
d_ashley
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. have you ever heard of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfwitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. sure BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
33. Have you ever heard of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Just to help you out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Funny, since hay-soos is alleged to have said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Oh, there it is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
56. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:40 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. Ah, but that's exactly what I'm saying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:43 PM Response to Reply #34 |
111. Elwrongo! Big Time! Time for a little education on your part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 02:54 PM Response to Reply #111 |
122. Elrighto! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 03:50 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. Deleted message |
d_ashley
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfwitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. but everybody else's point is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfwitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. "Jews today" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. "Old Testament Christians" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike1963
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. ROTFLMFAO! Good catch, I missed that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Homer12
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. My argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfwitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Sometimes it is hard to tell if they do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
48. Eh, correct me if I'm wrong, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greekspeak
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 02:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
121. Certainly not for Judaizing Christians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #121 |
125. I believe it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
52. Jews today stone children for disobedience? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #52 |
61. Whoa! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. so consider issue taken with the Bible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfwitch
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
49. And a misogynist. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Homer12
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I'm not taking issue with the Bible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats unite
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. The Bible also teaches us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maveric
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. The Bible was written by Men to control the idiot masses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anaxamander
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. Fine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:54 PM Response to Reply #27 |
112. Exactly. Simply stated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dawn
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
37. Well, then I guess I'll have to take issue with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
63. Have you eaten any shellfish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cthrumatrix
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
38. Don't waste your time arguing -- this is an election stunt --- ALL BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's the same as the bullshit bigoted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
32. The Skeptics Annotated Bible is a good resource..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the populist
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
36. I am AGAINST gay marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Why? Marriage is only a legal agreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the populist
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:43 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Well I hate to use a Repuke argument but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foreigncorrespondent
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #44 |
98. Um! Could the simple answer be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 10:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
114. "I hope no one takes me for a bigot. I'm really not." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greekspeak
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 02:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
123. Lovely slippery slope fallacy there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Well...I'm gay and I'd like to have all of the legal benefits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the populist
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:45 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. and I think you should have those rights... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. And what is the PROBLEM with non-traditional partners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the populist
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #50 |
58. There is no problem, really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 10:06 PM Response to Reply #58 |
115. That didn't take long, now, did it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 11:05 AM Response to Reply #58 |
117. "Working class outside NE is religious" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. Just Wondering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the populist
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:18 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:21 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. You just made my point for me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the populist
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:51 PM Response to Reply #70 |
87. We live in a more interconnected world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:00 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. I hate that for you. But we arent going to go to the back of the bus and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #87 |
126. I suppose it all depends on your definition of 'quickly' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:14 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:22 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. This could get interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:24 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. there's your sarcasm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:27 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Hey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:31 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. There's a difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:34 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:35 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. What does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:44 PM Response to Reply #74 |
83. Yup, and your bliss is more important than your child's air |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:47 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. It is interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:50 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Yup, and no surprise here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:54 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:11 PM Response to Reply #88 |
94. Don't patronize me. DEARY my ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:17 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:06 PM Response to Reply #74 |
91. well, killing animals and fouling the air is not the same... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:08 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. We KNOW where he's learning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #93 |
97. I have to ditto that. hehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:16 PM Response to Reply #59 |
66. I dont think you'd have a problem limiting marriage to .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. Yes, it is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:23 PM Response to Reply #59 |
72. How 'bout this-your typical argument: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:30 PM Response to Reply #72 |
76. Reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:37 PM Response to Reply #76 |
81. Can't defend an indefensible argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:49 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. I wasn't making an argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:02 PM Response to Reply #85 |
90. How rude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:07 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. It's expected, Cannikin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:21 PM Response to Reply #92 |
100. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:13 PM Response to Reply #90 |
95. I Am The Walrus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:19 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Since you haven't been around very long, and don't know me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:48 PM Response to Reply #99 |
102. Reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:24 PM Response to Reply #95 |
101. So tell me, YNGW (interesting name, by the way) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 08:49 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. I just asked a question. That's all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:08 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. You've got to be the most unfriendly DU'er I've encountered... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:14 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Oh yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:19 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. good lord..are you 15 or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:30 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. What's your problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats unite
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:57 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. Do you mean like interracial marriages? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:01 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. Well, at least do us a favor and oppose the amendment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:08 PM Response to Reply #46 |
60. That's the red-herring argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the populist
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Incest, no. Polygamy, possibly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphocrat
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:41 PM Response to Reply #64 |
82. I read it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #46 |
116. Just like that darn Emancipation Proclamation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. You may not be religious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
the populist
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:53 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Enlightened? Denying civil rights is enlightened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats unite
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 06:58 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Does anyone else smell hypocrisy here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #55 |
68. It's not the hypocrisy-it's the succumbing to RW Talking Points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 07:28 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. Not willing to take the step forward...taking the more..conservative route |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veracity
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
107. hung up society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cannikin
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:27 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. Well, 'free and uninhibited sexual practices' are stretching it a bit for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz
![]() |
Thu Jan-15-04 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
113. wow. what a creepy thread to have to read through. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Homer12
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
118. A Civil Marriage between 2 Consenting Adults |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Fri Jan-16-04 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
127. I AGREE WITH YOU HOMER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC