|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
| bill
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:03 PM Original message |
| NASA's Mars announcement |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cush
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. CNN has it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LibInternationalist
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. freakin' KICK |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Beetwasher
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Yup, I knew it! More updates please! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LibInternationalist
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 8. they're "equivocally" saying that the rocks might have been IN water |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Emperor_Norton_II
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. ...wait, did you say "liquid?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Beetwasher
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. It's what I suspected |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Emperor_Norton_II
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 9. Yeah, but did -they- say it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Beetwasher
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 11. Not clear to me either |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Qutzupalotl
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. It would have to be "was" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Beetwasher
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. Not necessarily true |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zero Gravitas
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 20. brine |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Emperor_Norton_II
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 18. Not necessarily |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bill
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 10. yep, liquid |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Beetwasher
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 14. But Past or current liquid? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zero Gravitas
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 17. past |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ediacara
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. data? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zero Gravitas
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 16. all of the above? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jpak
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 24. Photos suggest concretions (precipitation crystals) in finely bedded rock |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bryant69
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. It is nice to see enthusiasm for this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Screaming Lord Byron
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 12. No, we don't want to close down NASA, but we don't want it to be used as |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bryant69
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 29. Well I feel the same way |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jpak
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. Evidence for evaporative mineral sequence |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zero Gravitas
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. "blueberries" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jpak
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 26. Boy - I'd like to section one of those blueberries |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Minstrel Boy
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 32. They have been |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jpak
|
Tue Mar-02-04 03:34 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 33. Well I hope they found the seeds then... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Az
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Mars was once drenched with water |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Emperor_Norton_II
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. Rover finds evidence that Mars could once have supported life |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| moondust
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Was Mars once closer to the sun? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Emperor_Norton_II
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 27. Um, not really. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| moondust
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 28. Thanks! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DrWeird
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 30. It's likely the atmosphere was much thicker... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jpak
|
Tue Mar-02-04 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. Now discussing the need to bring samples back to earth |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| maveric
|
Tue Mar-02-04 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. How will the religious whackos explain this? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Zero Gravitas
|
Tue Mar-02-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 35. Its a test of faith |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 13th 2026, 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC