|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
| CatWoman
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:45 PM Original message |
| I am so $%#$@#E@# sick of the double standards!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| indigo32
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Couldn't agree with you more Catwoman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ex_jew
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. And don't forget - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| catzies
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Cat, I hear ya, darlin' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sheet22
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Typical, typical |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nostamj
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. they are scared dung-deficient of Dean |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cha
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. "Dung Deficient"! I like that! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blm
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 23. BushCo isn't doing that.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nothingshocksmeanymore
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. There is only one standard...stop being such an alarmist |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cha
|
Mon Aug-04-03 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Because they have to have something to "snicker" about to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cha
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Dan Quayle? Wow, he had delusions of Grandeur, no? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| thermodynamic
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. How did Clinton trash Shrub Sr? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pepperbelly
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 13. very wrong ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CatWoman
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 14. Looks like a trashing to me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Pepperbelly
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 15. HI! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CatWoman
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:48 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 19. Hi, Richard!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rasputin1952
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. I'm with you..,. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gratuitous
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. A lot of potentials means . . . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| brook
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. You're absolutely right. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ElsewheresDaughter
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Cat at one point there were 21 repukes running for ptresident in 2000 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CatWoman
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 20. Right, ED!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HootieMcBoob
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. You and me both sister |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blondeatlast
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Agreed wholeheartedly, and I'm NOT a Deanie! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CatWoman
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 22. BAL -- I'm leaning toward Kerry, too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mairead
|
Mon Aug-04-03 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. Why? Because you {generic} pay attention to it!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Feb 27th 2026, 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC