|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 07:17 AM Original message |
santorum and Kerry reportedly joined to co-sponsor a bill to insure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
danielftl
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. http://thomas.loc.gov/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 02:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Hi danielftl!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democat
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
2. Why not free speech instead of religion, if they want a new law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyingfish
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I know, at least I think you are, joking about.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devils Advocate NZ
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Such as? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brian Sweat
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 09:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. A religion must require you to take Jesus as your personal savior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 09:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Oh really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. thank you n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
searchingforlight
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
5. Kerry should not join Santorum on anything!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. It shows a willingness to work with others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. i think it will have a practical application. for instance the crucifix |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Right. There was a female Muslim police officer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Sure, and my response is: BFD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
searchingforlight
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. And that is my point. Work with others, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:59 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. There are stupid idiots and there are idiotic actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 11:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. And that kind of political brownie points -- that kind of pandering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 11:29 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. No Dean doesn't pander or waffle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangha
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 02:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Don't forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwolf68
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 02:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Pandering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:39 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. That will make the Democrats look like obstructionists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wonder
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 09:01 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. DITTO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfartinthewoods
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
7. goat slaughteriing in the cubicle allowed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangha
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 02:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Basically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinistrous
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
13. My read on this bill: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Thu Aug-07-03 02:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. That's about the size of it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC