|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 10:48 AM Original message |
Ralph Nader will endorse Green Party recall candidate Camejo in San Fran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CMT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
1. I wonder if he will say vote no on recall but yes forCamejo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. Of course he won't, he's a GOP agent PERIOD. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. empty dogmatic assertion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 01:50 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Are you saying that he'll urge voters to vote No on the recall? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:50 PM Original message |
thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiLempa (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
2. or maybe. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
3. He isn't "just a GOP agent." He has valid objections to both parties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 10:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. no, he's a GOP agent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:23 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. If Arnie were not running I would agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfartinthewoods (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:18 PM Response to Reply #21 |
77. victory photo-op of Arnie and Bush together on the stage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
25. Oh yeah, you're right, I forgot. How silly of me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 02:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
62. More great political advice from Rich Lombardi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:40 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Deleted message |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
4. Will he tell people to vote against the recall? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
5. If they vote NO-Camejo, that could be a good thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Since the Dems endorsed YES, I dont know why Nader shouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. "The Dems" endorsed Yes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:08 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Cruz Bustamante? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:13 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Oh, I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:17 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. You disagree? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:20 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. The vote is not an either or situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:22 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. It strikes me as smart politics, under the circumstances. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:25 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. partly right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:32 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:36 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:42 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Not true at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:50 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
78. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:41 PM Response to Reply #32 |
49. Iverson you are usually an advocate of logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:43 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:46 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. The shift was the reality of the situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:42 PM Response to Reply #52 |
68. the reality of the situation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:57 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. Ter honey smoke a little less before you post. Tha California legislature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:32 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. honey, havent smoked anything today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinanator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 06:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
86. the sequence of events |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:30 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. ok, then why not prop up Bustamante? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:35 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I don't see why you think we need to pick one or the other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:38 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. well, I see your position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:45 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Well, there's a good chance we'd have Arnold under the old strategy too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:50 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. well...time will tell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. You know the answer to that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Dems are stating Vote No on the recall, then vote for Cruz B. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:32 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. I would hope they'll endorse NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
73. Yes why not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
15. likely to see both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
9. idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. oh nevermind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Nader is screwing the Dems - again - discuss..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. no, the excuses for you to bitch and complain about how inadequate Dems R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
16. Ralph Nader will drop his pants and whistle Dixie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
24. if Ralph is a GOP plant, how should we label Huffington? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:35 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. nice site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SEAburb (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:49 AM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Arianna is the left, right, middle, inside, outside candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
80. the point is, she too will most likely draw votes from Bustamante |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:35 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. because she's not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:40 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. i'm not saying she is, Terwilliger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SEAburb (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:55 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. a couple of weeks ago I called her a neo-con Trojan horse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
30. I'm one Californian who agrees with Nader on this one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:00 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. Make that 2 Californians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:14 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. On Bustamante... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 01:10 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. Maybe you should post a thread in Campaign/Politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 02:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. I'll work on that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 02:41 PM Response to Reply #39 |
63. How can you think Davis is OK... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:17 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Thing about him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 02:26 PM Response to Reply #30 |
61. the problem is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
40. This really shouldn't surprise anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. You know that that is false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 02:20 PM Response to Reply #42 |
60. There hasn't been a vacuum of Dem silence in California which undermines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:45 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:59 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. Only as concerns the state level not the national level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:46 PM Response to Reply #60 |
70. Hmm...yet everyone is ready to lynch Davis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:00 PM Response to Reply #70 |
76. So what was the farm union bill he signed, the family leave bill or the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 04:25 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. will that win him the state? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 05:33 PM Response to Reply #79 |
85. It might. Lots of families in the central valley affected by that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 01:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
57. intellectually dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StandWatie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. Camejo took 11% last election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:16 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Actually, less than 6% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StandWatie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:18 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. you are right.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 01:55 PM Response to Reply #46 |
56. Must've been Alameda! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
45. Camejo previously indicated possible support for Bustamante. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trek234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
47. Actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StandWatie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 12:22 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. anyone could win this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Julien Sorel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 02:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
65. Arnold is a mortal lock for at least 25 - 30% of the vote as things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 02:47 PM Response to Reply #47 |
64. The only way the Greens could win this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:48 PM Response to Reply #64 |
71. The only way Dems can win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
59. Ha!ha! I was right about the Newshax article! "Greens plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-12-03 03:48 PM Response to Reply #59 |
72. yes, they act like Democrats! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jun 17th 2024, 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC