when the next attack occurs, I already know who to blame

[mopaul]

when the first attack occured 3 years ago, THEY told us who to blame.
but, it's never been proven to me that al qaeda did it, and if that's the official white house story, then i don't believe it.

so when the next big attack occurs, which they've assured us it will, and very soon, i know exactly who to blame, and it won't be osama, or saddama or his mamma. the blame will be on bush, one way or the other. in fact, the blame is on him for the first attack too.

when you go into the world like romans, don't be surprised to run into a few snags, and don't be surprised if 'they' hate us for our freedoms. when you go torturing, raping and murdering folks, BESIDES blasting them all to hell, they'll likely strike back at some point. ask general armstrong custer.

when the next big one hits, there can only be one group of terrorists to blame. the terrorists in the white house.

[rpannier]

1. shrub'll blame

clinton. When something goes bad, it's always clinton's fault. in shrubs world.

[Bullshot]

2. Bush and his stooges glowingly point to the fact

there have been no attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11, and the chicken little policies and bureaucracy they've imposed on us are the reason why. That's like the alcoholic claiming he's cured because he hasn't had any DUIs lately.

[mopaul]

3. this ring keeps lions away

you don't see any lions around do you? taking credit for no further attacks only inforces my suspicions that they did the first attack.