Onlooker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 02:56 PM
Original message |
| Anyone know of a good article that refutes the attacks on F911? |
|
I've read various interviews with Moore ,and I find the claims of the right-wing to be lies themselves, but I haven't found an article that does a reasonably thorough job of listing the right-wing claim and providing the progressive response. Anyone know of one?
|
| Hoping4Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 02:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Have you checked out Paul Thompson's 911 Timeline? |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-28-04 03:04 PM by Hoping4Change
|
| Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. First of all, there has to be an intelligent attack |
|
If you notice, the detractors are not really mentioning any inaccuracies, just (loudly) making the accusations.
You can argue the point or the intent of the film, but it doesn't need to be refuted or debunked.
|
| nostamj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
he debunks every one in detail
www.michaelmoore.com
|
| Killarney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message |
|
An editorial here: http://www.opednews.com/wade_062604_blocking_fahrenheit_911.htmAlso go to michaelmoore.com and he has a whole F911 Facts section detailing the facts and the lies the RW is spreading about him. |
| K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. The Only "Attacks" I've Seen Are Totally Ilogical |
|
Like "he thinks Saddam was perfect" or "he hates America" or "he's a liar" I haven't really seen any fact in the movie attacked...and THERE WERE LOTS OF THEM!
|
| K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. The Only "Attacks" I've Seen Are Totally Ilogical |
|
Like "he thinks Saddam was perfect" or "he hates America" or "he's a liar" I haven't really seen any fact in the movie attacked...and THERE WERE LOTS OF THEM!
|
| papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. I agree - Moorewatch.com's attack is sad fact less bull shit |
|
but then that means it's attack "points" should be on Fox tonight.
|
| KalamazooKid
(126 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Its easy to confirm anything in the film with minimal research. Moore could have gone much farther, but he seems to have included unassailable facts. A good choice IMHO.
____Kal
|
| Beacho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-28-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Canuckistatian Hit it on the head |
|
There has to be a cogent, reasoned critique to respond to, and none has surfaced.
Moore vetted this film to within an inch of it's life and it's driving the 'wingers'
batshit crazy
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Mar 05th 2026, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
