|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
THUNDER HANDS
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:03 PM Original message |
If Securing Iraq Meant "The Draft" Coming Back...Would You Support It? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarkPhenyx
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. Damn skippy I would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprobate
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. "Starship Trooper" philosophy--They got it from the Spartans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarkPhenyx
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 10:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
42. And it worked for the Spartans too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wwagsthedog
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. Only if the order of callup is wealthiest first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. AND involves the immediate families |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonAndSun
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I'm with progrocker69.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not in a million years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Yes....that's why we got rid of it....endless troops being supplied by US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreatCaesarsGhost
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
4. i'm for it regardless of iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Can you please clearly explain the phrase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreatCaesarsGhost
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. which word don't you understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:22 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Never mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreatCaesarsGhost
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:17 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. jeepers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poskonig
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
6. I categorically do not support drafts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. NOOOO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. You just beat me to it, silverweb! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. Absolutely not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
plurality
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. fuck no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
13. Thank you General Westmoreland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
15. ONLY if the BUSH family kids go 1st |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ein
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
18. Nope Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnyawl
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
19. FUCK NO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malikshah
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
20. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrdinaryTa
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
21. No, Of Course Not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. if the U.N. took over that wouldn't be necessary, even nato could help... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROUDNWLIBERAL
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 08:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Military training |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. no one deserves to be lied to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
27. I've always supported required national service. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:22 AM Response to Reply #27 |
48. Good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMarple
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:36 AM Response to Reply #27 |
52. Immigrants? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
28. No way! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackie97
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
29. I'm against this occupation to begin with.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
30. That's Vietnam talk....if only we had more soldiers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
32. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greekspeak
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
33. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beanball
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
34. Bring back the draft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jfkennedy
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
35. Cut military funding by 95% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeakOil2008
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
36. Draft? HA! Cheney and Poppy Bush can go F*ck themselves! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trek234
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
37. This is the shit that makes me want to vote Green |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 10:09 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. fine dude, but it's... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 11:22 PM Response to Reply #37 |
45. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
38. I am against the draft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Kitten
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
39. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Devlzown
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
40. FUCK NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
43. Only if Republicans get drafted first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sweetpea
![]() |
Wed Aug-20-03 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
44. HELL NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
46. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMarple
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
47. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:23 AM Response to Original message |
49. Fuck the draft, this is what you do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
50. Howz about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMarple
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:53 AM Response to Reply #50 |
54. And I'm sure you are recalling the Germans who turned on Rome? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gemini Cat
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
51. Not for any reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redeye
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
53. Not a chance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
55. Absolutely not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booberdawg
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
56. We need international involvement, not more U.S. troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 03:43 AM Response to Original message |
57. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 07:35 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. NO....NO....NO TO THE DRAFT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catmandu57
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
59. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HootieMcBoob
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
60. No and Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Thu Aug-21-03 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
61. If |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 22nd 2024, 06:54 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC