LiberalCat
(257 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-04 09:12 PM
Original message |
| Will the super-wealthy power brokers ever turn on *bush? |
|
My mom is in her 80's. I had the first-ever political discussion with her! When I was a kid, she said voting was private and she would not tell anyone whom she voted for, so we never talked politics.
She spends her time reading and playing bridge. I asked her what she had been reading. She read a biography of Aristotle Onassis. She was shocked how the super-wealthy wield their power and how they trade women and wives with abandon. She said, "The wealthy power-brokers will never allow John Kerry to be president."
She also has read a biography of former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill. He stated that Nixon and Reagan were intelligent, but after his first meeting with *bush, he concluded that "*bush knows nothing".
She is currently reading "Tour of Duty" about John Kerry. She is very impressed how he has always been for the underdog, always seen the good in people, and came to prominence on his own, unlike the Kennedy's, who came to power with an assist from their father. She also believes Iraq is another Vietnam, in her words "a disaster".
She is obviously on our side, but she has no hope of a Kerry win. The wealthy did well under Clinton, but what about the super-wealthy? It is possible that they have the power to control the election. If they do have that power, what will turn them away from "the squatter in the White House" and turn them on to a Kerry presidency? Or is it hopeless, like she says?
|
charlyvi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. If the economy collapses and they start losing money |
|
they'll turn on bush* in a heartbeat.
|
cprise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-04 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. The super-wealthy did fabulous under Clinton |
|
Do not be fooled. The Democratic Party functions for them in tandem with the Republicans. It is their role to be pistol-whipped while pushing conservative economic policies; it is merely an insurance policy just in case on of them believes their own populist rhetoric.
Oh... and John Kerry is no JF Kennedy. He has already helped push through a new "free" trade agreement.
|
physioex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I am sure some of the supe wealthy have ties to Europe... |
|
And have been told that they are not happy with what this country is doing. Will that effect what they do? I don't have an answer....
But some one like Rupert Murdoch would stand behind Shrub no matter what....
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Well, whether the "power brokers" want a Kerry win or not... |
|
it's just too bad cause I believe Kerry is going to win!
And won't your Mom and all of us be too happy!
|
LiberalCat
(257 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
And, yes, a majority of the people in this country and the world would be too happy!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Feb 27th 2026, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message |