realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-08-04 10:26 AM
Original message |
| Pre-emptive strikes are terrorist strikes.... |
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-08-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
sweetheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-08-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That ontology works best. Meme racism with it as well, as a form of preemptive hate, the early psychology of terrorism, making a path in life by terror, reacting to fear.
A child crouching on the floor as her parents hatefully curse each other across the room because they each blame the other for failing to pay the rent, for losing their job, or not working extra shifts. Terrorism starts at home.
Somehow it must come home.
|
wiggs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-08-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
This wasn't pre-emptive. It was preventative. Pre-emptive wars, where one country makes a first strike in the face of an obvious attack by another country, are understood and generally accepted. Preventative wars are different animals and are not acceptable.
|
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-08-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Pre-emption isn't striking after an attack |
|
...it's like arresting a person before they've committed a criminal act.
It's not American. We still live by laws and when we don't we don't have a democracy.
|
spooked
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-08-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. How about: 9/11 was the Terrorists' Pre-emptive Strike |
realFedUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-08-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
and now the door's open for any country to strike pre-emptively against another...the definition of the people might be loosey goosey, but it's still a crime against another.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Feb 14th 2026, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message |