|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
| ChavezSpeakstheTruth
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:40 AM Original message |
| Freepers say CBS used forgeries |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fovea
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. LOL |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cthrumatrix
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 22. shit ...meet fan |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. They truly cannot handle the truth |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madmax
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Yes, it's a vast left wing conspiracy against bush. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RichardRay
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:08 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 30. OETR = 'Officer Efficiency and Training Report' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| skypilot
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. If they were forgeries... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cmd
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. I guess that means the WH released forgeries yesterday |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| librechik
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. yeah, didn't bartlett bring out the originals |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| da_chimperor
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. Aww, cute! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. Something like them... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bandit
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 13. I believe you are not that far from the truth |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rocktivity
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. How do they explain the Bush White House releasing them, too? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| John BigBootay
|
Thu Sep-09-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 62. The WH "released" the same docs that CBS faxed them n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| StClone
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. Fatuous fonts -- lol |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Thu Sep-09-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Who was the guy who claimed he witnessed the purge? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:04 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. No luck yet |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Judi Lynn
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:48 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 25. Does "Retired Lt. Col. Bill Burkett" sound familiar? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| redqueen
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:35 AM Response to Reply #25 |
| 36. Well done - thank you! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Athletic Grrl
|
Thu Sep-09-04 07:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 66. Holy crapola! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| louis-t
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 26. found it! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| StClone
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:00 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 28. Nice work |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LuminousX
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. Interesting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EST
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. Actually, contrary to FR |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jmowreader
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 29. They were also extremely rugged |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| yardwork
|
Thu Sep-09-04 02:39 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 39. I have an old selectric. It doesn't work all that well, though. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| htuttle
|
Thu Sep-09-04 02:41 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 40. It's easy to make a rugged typewriter if you don't care how much it weighs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jmowreader
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 53. Cast iron, I think |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Barad Simith
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 58. Yes, I have one I'd like to sell |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:34 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 35. Here is the Selectric Composer |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Frodo
|
Thu Sep-09-04 02:56 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 44. If that's true... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kathy in Cambridge
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:15 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 48. Hmmm |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Frodo
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 50. Wow! With a sig like "rational", I'd think |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kathy in Cambridge
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:53 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 51. But truth is colored by ideology |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Frodo
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 54. PERCEPTION of reality is colored by ideology... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadHound
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
| 16. Hah! These people are idiots! And I can say |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jmowreader
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:48 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 24. A little snippet of communist history for MadHound |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Frodo
|
Thu Sep-09-04 02:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 45. What font is it printed in? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Frodo
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 47. Ok, on further review. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| msmcghee
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. In 1971 I worked for an office equipment dealer . . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| msmcghee
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:31 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 18. Ooops, I missed RevRussell's post. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EST
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:33 AM Response to Reply #17 |
| 19. You are correct. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| yardwork
|
Thu Sep-09-04 02:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 41. I can confirm that this technology was not new in the early 1980s |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bridget Burke
|
Thu Sep-09-04 02:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 43. I used a Selectric Composer in the early 70's..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| salvorhardin
|
Thu Sep-09-04 05:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 61. You're right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rumguy
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 20. This is the essence of their argument |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jmowreader
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. As usual, the freepers don't know what they're talking about |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. The IBM Selectric could change fonts... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cat Atomic
|
Thu Sep-09-04 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 27. You'd think they'd stop and ask themselves, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ChavezSpeakstheTruth
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:11 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 31. YES!!! If they were forgeries then Bush could be impeached in a second!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| John BigBootay
|
Thu Sep-09-04 05:44 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 63. The WH didn't find or produce these memos, guys-- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Spazito
|
Thu Sep-09-04 05:47 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 64. CBS had experts examine the documents and they found no fault |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:32 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 34. This might explain your forgeries. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 32. Anyone know if superscript was used in those days? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| msmcghee
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:49 AM Response to Reply #32 |
| 38. Yes, many type balls had special characters. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| yardwork
|
Thu Sep-09-04 02:52 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 42. Skilled secretaries typed everything before PCs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| yellowcanine
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 46. Also Mag card IBMs were available in late 60s - They were really |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| juajen
|
Thu Sep-09-04 06:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 65. Yes, indeed, I was one of those skilled ladies |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gothmog
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 33. LOL Freepers are so stupid that this is funny |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ChavezSpeakstheTruth
|
Thu Sep-09-04 11:36 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 37. Yes show the world they were forged so we can show Bush is a criminal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dryan
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:54 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 52. IBM equipment.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Snazzy
|
Thu Sep-09-04 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. IBM's first proportional typewriter--dates to 1944 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Snazzy
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 60. wrong font |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gothmog
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 55. Freeper on Disney Board are attacking CBS documents |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rawstory
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 56. SOURCE for DRUDGE 'news' story heads Conservative Victory Committee |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rawstory
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:32 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 59. and his other 'source' sits ON THE BOARD of a conservative thinktank |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bobbyboucher
|
Thu Sep-09-04 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 57. Denial is a powerful thing. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BigBigBear
|
Thu Sep-09-04 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 67. OK, fine |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Mar 27th 2026, 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC