Can we compare documents from the WH on Bush 71-73 to CBS

[jumpstart33]

documents? They looked pretty similar to me. Also, comparing the signatures of Killian. Can we please compare signatures from the same time period? I have changed my signature over time, haven't you?

But all that aside: Did Bush get favortism and push ahead of hundreds to get into the NG to avoid going to Viet Nam? Yes!

Did he fulfill all of his requirements? No!

Enough said.

[bowens43]

1. There is no evidence supporting the forgery theory.

[dogtag]

2. Crikey! Dan Abrams had two

so called experts on his show...one a IBM typewriter guy and the other a document expert. Both concluded that the docs being genuine was 'possible', but unlikely. Again, no discussion of the contents, just more blather about forgeries. Yawn...

[Wednesdays]

4. Geez Louise, we could play that game forever...

I mean, tell the pukes to PROVE that any document (you name it) is genuine...

Are all the documents that made * emperor genuine?

What about all of the so-called evidence against Bin Laden and Al Qaida, maybe those were forgeries? Ask the freepers to prove otherwise.

Are all the freeper's birth certificates genuine (were their parents really married at the time)?

Maybe Elvis' death certificate was forged, and he's actually walking among us? Prove its authenticity.

Prove that the Declaration of Independence hanging there in D.C. is genuine and not a copy...

Hey, maybe everything supposedly incriminating against Democrats over the past 100 years were actually forged documents or digitally altered photos or videos. PROVE THEY WEREN'T!

[mr_du04]

3. Bushie could go on live TV and swear that the docs were genuine and the

freepers would still not believe it well actually if he did swear it I would start to think they are forgeries since the man can never tell the truth. :)