|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:15 AM Original message |
OMG! OMG! OMG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. Do they have any teenagers in the house? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. NOPE! No kids! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roccia e Segale
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
53. Well I hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
2. They may change their sign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 09:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Pro-life only refers to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
3. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. There's no persuading anyone who would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vivalarev
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:27 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Oh yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
7. They have the same right to free speech that we enjoy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I would say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coreystone
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 09:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
50. I agree! None of us would be pleased if some "freeper" did the same.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
9. This is great! It show that the country's Democrats are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. Put a more modest sign on your yard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:57 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I can't put ANY sign in my yard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PA Democrat
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
11. My wing-nut neighbors have a Bush signs all over their house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 11:27 AM Response to Reply #11 |
29. love your son's sign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Longhorn
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 12:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
37. Good for your son! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
13. Well, as a homeowner I cannot condone the toilet papering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 09:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I agree ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 09:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Toilet papering is a non-violent, non destructive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 04:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
122. It is destructive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 12:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
35. I agree...not cool at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
17. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. My pleasure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Love Bug
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
19. Geez, now they'll just go to church on Sunday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:12 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Let 'em! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Daniels
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
21. Wow. And you all claim to be superior to the general population |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:29 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. It's TOILET PAPER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:40 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I've had my house egged before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Eggs can RUIN things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
55. So put up your own sign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
54. Agree theboss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:00 PM Response to Reply #23 |
52. It's not the toilet paper incognito |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:34 PM Response to Reply #23 |
114. It's very funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
117. Get over your righteousness..it was toilet paper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
22. I'm glad you are not my neighbor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:30 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I'm glad your not my neighbor too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJazz
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:38 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Vandalized!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 11:16 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Ditto that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sffreeways
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
44. Why are you characterizing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
30. I don't care the sign, but I don't support vandalism (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
31. ...and you had nothing to do with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 11:59 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. No, I was at a fundraiser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Artemis Bunyon
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
33. Man, do I EVER get annoyed at posts like this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 12:33 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Then why the HELL did you click on it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Artemis Bunyon
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. OMG! Because it's so fricking annoying! OMG! OMG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 12:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Yes, but you fogote Woohoo. As in WooHoo!! WooHoo !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Artemis Bunyon
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 12:53 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 12:52 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I loved it! and I love it when you hate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Momma Mia
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:08 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Um ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:16 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:29 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 07:49 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Deleted message |
Momma Mia
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 09:14 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. You are correct ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
115. Man, do I ever get annoyed at posters like you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
43. TPing a house is childish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 11:57 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Good post, ocelot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:14 PM Response to Reply #43 |
60. Agree Ocelot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Dog
![]() |
Fri Oct-01-04 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
45. I Had My Home Paint-Balled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
51. Sorry -- I'm against you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. The TP was down within hours of this post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blecht
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:14 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. You should educate yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:35 PM Response to Reply #59 |
71. This neighbor was not targeted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:47 PM Response to Reply #71 |
84. Thought != Action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:03 PM Response to Reply #84 |
94. If a person put a public advertisement on their lawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #94 |
108. So if you put up a sign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:09 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. I am not saying all reactions to advertisements are justified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. Slippery slope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:49 PM Response to Reply #112 |
120. Illegal reactions to advertisements should have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:18 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Two things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:20 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. I find it hard tofeel sorry for that Ilk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:26 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. By that logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:33 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. I agree they would reap the whirlwind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:36 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. That is sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blecht
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
56. Thanks for filling out a RW straw man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:18 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Deleted message |
Blecht
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:19 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Yes, I could be more obnoxious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:29 PM Response to Reply #56 |
68. The Nazi analogy doesn't work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:34 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Slippery slope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:35 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. I wasn't talking about the sign. I was talking about the Nazi analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:38 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:43 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. "I may not believe what you have to say, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:47 PM Response to Reply #78 |
85. We're on the same page(NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blecht
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:37 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. Nice post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:42 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. They are perfectly appropriate to your response... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blecht
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:44 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:45 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Fair enough. I disagree also... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blecht
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:51 PM Response to Reply #81 |
87. Now it's time for me to go back to my regular job here ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:04 PM Response to Reply #87 |
95. Nothing like the anti-choice wants to do with women's rights though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:01 PM Response to Reply #74 |
93. If the chimp is reSelected in this election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
58. Criminal Tresspass, Vandalisim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:26 PM Response to Reply #58 |
65. The DUer did not do any of those things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:29 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. I would not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #67 |
82. You may be a better person than I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:49 PM Response to Reply #82 |
86. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:56 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. I would not put up an advertisement in my front lawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:06 PM Response to Reply #90 |
97. The reaction is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:25 PM Response to Reply #97 |
103. I am not saying it is illegal to advertise your beliefs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:39 PM Response to Reply #103 |
107. Basic free speech.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:38 PM Response to Reply #107 |
116. Putting up advertisements about social and religious beliefs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 04:27 PM Response to Reply #116 |
126. This is black and white |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #103 |
131. ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat 4 Ever
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:58 PM Response to Reply #67 |
91. I don't agree with the sign, but not particularly upset by the TP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
76. I agree with the nay-sayers here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George W. Dunce
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:53 PM Response to Reply #76 |
88. Get a grip people it's toilet paper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:05 PM Response to Reply #88 |
96. There is a difference between post-big-game hijinks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George W. Dunce
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:08 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. Unless they were part of the group that did the TPing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #98 |
102. We'll never know exactly why this particular TPing occurred, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 05:27 PM Response to Reply #88 |
132. If I thought this was a random act of mischievousness, I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
80. Abortion: stupid worthless issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
claudiajean
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:59 PM Response to Reply #80 |
92. Please tell me that you are being sarcastic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 05:32 PM Response to Reply #80 |
133. Abortion is a complicated issue, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerry-is-my-prez
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
83. Ok - C'mon fess up.... How much did you pay those kids to TP the house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdigi420
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
89. toiletpapering is free speech! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:15 PM Response to Reply #89 |
100. Criminal trespass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George W. Dunce
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. I seriously doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:35 PM Response to Reply #101 |
106. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #89 |
124. No it isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
99. Jesus... The Great DU Toilet Paper Controversy !!! - We MUST Be Winning !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:29 PM Response to Reply #99 |
105. The reaction to the TP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUSTANG_2004
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:55 PM Response to Reply #105 |
109. The right to choose is NOT hanging by a thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:13 PM Response to Reply #109 |
111. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUSTANG_2004
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Ever heard of a filibuster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:48 PM Response to Reply #113 |
119. Indeed I have heard of the filibuster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUSTANG_2004
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:52 PM Response to Reply #119 |
121. I don't know why you're saying "If" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #121 |
123. IF they win a BIGGER more CONSERVATIVE majority...the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 05:35 PM Response to Reply #109 |
134. And if Roe versus Wade disappeared tomorrow, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neuvocat
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
104. What, no pictures? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
118. Pull the board out of your asses! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #118 |
125. All fine and dandy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 04:28 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. No one ripped down their sign...it's STILL there. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radius
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 04:40 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. It was nice of them to trespass and vandalize and leave the sign(NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. I thought so too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
130. An immature attempt to prove what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 05:43 PM Response to Reply #130 |
135. This reminds me of an old George Carlin joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortyfeetunder
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
136. Well, do they want the DEATH PENALTY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BonjourUSA
![]() |
Sat Oct-02-04 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
137. How long is necessary for doing such a bullshit ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Jun 24th 2024, 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC