|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Speed8098
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 06:17 AM Original message |
Olbermann says Bev Harris won't go on Countdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. Damn, that's sobering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom-mad-about-bush
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:49 AM Response to Reply #1 |
47. This is Bev Harris reply to Keith Olberman..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe she doesn't want to be killed nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zomby Woof
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 07:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Then she is a gutless fraud after all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 07:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Deleted message |
Lerkfish
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. whoa, dude, you are WAAAAY out of line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
59. WAAAAAAAAY out of line is right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Deleted message |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:14 AM Response to Reply #5 |
35. I smell the same thing you and Keith smell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:15 AM Response to Reply #5 |
60. It was a small paragraph. How could you miss this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DRoseDARs
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yet another thread about the deafening silence... one theory floating... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malva Zebrina
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yesterday it was reported that a subpeona was handed to Teresa LePore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. another take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starlight
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:20 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. "fuck the nicey nice shit" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:55 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Lonestarnot hit the nail on the head! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. I'm more concerned about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. KILLS COOPERATION!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guarionex
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
28. Bev Hariss should at least TALK on TV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozymandius
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
6. Bev Harris has initiated a lawsuit. She cannot say anything publicly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
10. I adore Bev Harris ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malva Zebrina
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:44 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I am not slamming BH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:36 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Have you not been paying attention? THEY don't play by the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio_liberal
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
11. I'm confused... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:42 AM Response to Reply #11 |
44. YES! she has. MANY times and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cybildisobedience
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
12. seriously.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malva Zebrina
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:51 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. the point of the vote investigation is not to embarrass anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Killarney
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
13. there's a lot more on Olbermann's blog about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. since Ms. Harris refuses to speak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:37 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I'm so disgusted with DUers turning against Bev after all her work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:48 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. She's appeared on marginal radio stations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:50 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. uh, she's also appeared on Lou Dobbs and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:57 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Your post further supports my position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Olberman states she 'can't' share the TAPES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. IMO, it's because there's no there there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:16 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. its really quite simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:25 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. BINGO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:36 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. now she's threatening Olberman, one of them, Keith or Bev, is lying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:52 AM Response to Reply #42 |
51. Ahhhhh, and the Christofascists are in a heaven of liberal making |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:49 AM Response to Reply #37 |
46. Doesn't she need access to the Central Tabulators first before she can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canadianbeaver
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #23 |
53. I agree........N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Olberman is still a lightweight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:00 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I disagree, Olbnerman is mainstream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:33 AM Response to Reply #33 |
40. She is in the middle of research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:36 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Sorry, but the history from Bev makes me trust Olberman more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolinian
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:49 AM Response to Reply #40 |
48. Then certainly she could provide an explanation and do so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Protagoras
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:15 AM Response to Reply #40 |
61. Well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
17. geeze |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gorbal
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
24. I think because she was canceled on once it was probabaly a big deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:56 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. REad the article, She canceled on THEM, they never canceled on her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:50 AM Response to Reply #30 |
49. Not according to Bev |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolinian
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:51 AM Response to Reply #24 |
50. No, SHE cancelled. KO said so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apache4888
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
38. Olberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #38 |
52. Bush didn't win. The repukes committed FRAUD and Olbermann has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:57 AM Response to Reply #38 |
54. "Bush won, fair and square" HAHAHBWAAHAHAHAH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imajika
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
39. Oh, I am sure what she has is as big.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:40 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. here's the latest update from Bev's site... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:11 AM Response to Reply #39 |
58. we've heard the Pentagon Papers/ fear of assassination thing before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolinian
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
45. Olberman appears to be far more level-headed than Bev. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
55. This crap is unbelievable! DU, eating our own again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shopaholic
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:05 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Look, I don't know who is telling the truth here, KO or Bev but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:07 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. All I am interested in is the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:17 AM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Is it not true that the votes had to be certified BEFORE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
63. locking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC