|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:01 PM Original message |
Poll question: Is this a disrespectful statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. if you want it to be less controversial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Why should "mythology" be controversial? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. you asked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuskerDem
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 11:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
181. Are you not the one who asked if it was disrespectful? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
70. Also: scientific theories are not "proven", but "corroborated". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Outrider
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
120. even better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:43 AM Response to Reply #120 |
134. Religious Philosophy is an Oxymoron |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Evolution is a FACT! Creation is an OPINION. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. you horrible HORRIBLE BIGOT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleurs du Mal
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Rather euphemistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. "Mythology" is usually a loaded word. "Mythos" works much better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawladyprof
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Maybe allegory. Mythology has a negative connotation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
75. exactly.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:28 PM Response to Reply #75 |
96. Yes, ignorance and inability to read played a large part in Kerry's loss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 09:11 AM Response to Reply #96 |
145. not dumb down...do the same thing that we are requesting the conservs do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:57 PM Response to Reply #75 |
190. So we should deny the truth and pander to zealots? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phylny
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
85. I agree with your point! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rkc3
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. Have you ever heard Lewis Black's comments on the Old Testament? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Lewis Black? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. So, enlighten us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. I'm not here to do your bidding.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 01:45 AM Response to Reply #32 |
139. Yes you ARE! Bow down to Bridget Burke!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I've read it,. many times in several translations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. yes - stay away from the locoweed and quit fucking the sheep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cats Against Frist
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. Now THAT's disrespectful :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
49. Many times? Several translations? Rantings? Maniacal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
79. Then why don't your fellow fundies practice what Jesus preached? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:19 PM Response to Reply #79 |
91. What's a fundie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:00 AM Response to Reply #91 |
140. You. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 10:49 AM Response to Reply #140 |
150. Fun with fundie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marxdem
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:40 PM Response to Reply #79 |
119. Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestatepatriot
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
88. I'm not here to bible bash... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 11:59 AM Response to Reply #88 |
153. Amen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:21 PM Response to Reply #49 |
93. BWAHAHAHAHA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoNotRefill
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
109. rantings of maniacal nomadic goatherds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 06:58 AM Response to Reply #109 |
142. I'm trying to be nice here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
43. yes and when a man is standing he is not sitting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. Truth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:23 PM Response to Reply #55 |
67. good lord! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:11 PM Response to Reply #67 |
87. Think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:31 PM Response to Reply #87 |
102. I'll put it this way, my life is worth a lot more than the maniacal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:32 PM Response to Reply #87 |
103. yes I have a problem with authority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datasuspect
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:34 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. why do you hate god? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:36 PM Response to Reply #87 |
118. I just went and looked at your Interview with the Devil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 11:57 AM Response to Reply #118 |
152. Not my interview... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:12 PM Response to Reply #152 |
156. that comment about lifestyle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:19 PM Response to Reply #156 |
162. Just answers.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:52 AM Response to Reply #87 |
135. I fell for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
122. and it's absolutely true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #122 |
154. Read (and understand) the whole book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Sun Dec-05-04 11:03 PM Response to Reply #154 |
184. I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
8. Deleted message |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. hahahahahahahahahaha...............True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
64. MESSAGE BOARD RULE #2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:26 PM Response to Reply #64 |
71. Oh, I'm familiar with the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuskerDem
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 11:38 PM Response to Reply #71 |
182. "there must be something WRONG WITH YOU" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:45 PM Response to Reply #182 |
201. Here's the difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:48 PM Response to Reply #64 |
124. thinking your beliefs are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:07 PM Response to Reply #124 |
155. Jesus is a messenger.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
9. as one of those whacky christians... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
12. Irrespective re: disrespect....Clarification needed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 08:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
177. ROTF.... Ravi Zacharias! Are you kidding me!?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
17. it is a disrespectful statement..if you want to say the same thing but in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Sorry, but it *IS* mythology by definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. no some people have decided that it is mythology.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. You need to check your dictionary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. and you know perfectly well that dictionary terminology is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Dude, educate yourself, the basis of ANY religion is a MYTH by DEFINITION! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:03 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. again learn the difference between dictionary definition and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:05 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Common usage dictates that allreligions are based upon myths |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. Deleted message |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Thanks for the personal attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. Also based on mythology!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:17 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Nope, I embrace the mythology for what it is and revel in the beauty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. I believe he called CREATION a myth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. PROOF: All god(s) are myths by definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
63. RUGettingpostdeleted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 01:05 PM Response to Reply #63 |
157. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:52 PM Response to Reply #157 |
167. Unless you're RU's sockpuppet you'll see my response was directed at him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
195. but that is not really the point and you know it Walt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
78. The basis of Christianity is Jesus Christ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. The Shroud of Turin is a hoax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:25 PM Response to Reply #78 |
95. My answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bzmtq5
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 01:53 PM Response to Reply #95 |
159. This getting fun.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:41 PM Response to Reply #159 |
187. I proved that all gods are myths by defnition in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:41 PM Response to Reply #187 |
199. no Walt you didn't prove anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datasuspect
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:30 PM Response to Reply #78 |
99. so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:33 PM Response to Reply #99 |
105. I prefer to think of it as an androcentric death cult |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
m berst
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 06:11 PM Response to Reply #78 |
111. cruising along here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:56 PM Response to Reply #78 |
126. dear oh dear oh dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. The socially acccepted definition is the dictionary definition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
54. no it really isn't. which is why not too long ago a guy was fired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:28 PM Response to Reply #54 |
74. too bad - I've heard Peter Jennings use it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:58 PM Response to Reply #54 |
84. And he should not have been let go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 01:56 PM Response to Reply #54 |
160. I think the "niggardly" guy was rehired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cats Against Frist
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #25 |
59. The word itself doesn't even matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Dude. look up the definition of myth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CarbonDate
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 06:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
113. And a child with unwed parents *is* a bastard by defintion.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #113 |
147. aye, but theology is usually only used in context of the study |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:43 PM Response to Reply #113 |
200. but of course the purpose is to be rude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I don't think any living religion should be called mythology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Then you had better not refer to Greek mythology or Norse Mythology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
80. you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
83. My religion is based on "The Lord of the Rings Trilogy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:29 PM Response to Reply #83 |
97. Expand you mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 03:17 PM Response to Reply #97 |
204. And on the seventh day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
53. why is it "belittling" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. And even superiority over some religions that are still living |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cats Against Frist
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
66. Uh -- who says that Baal isn't "the man?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 09:57 AM Response to Reply #66 |
148. Ba'al eats babies - he's a meanie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datasuspect
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
82. what other ideas, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:59 PM Response to Reply #23 |
127. how do you know no-one beleives in those Gods anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 05:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
206. They're mutually exclusive! At least N-1 of them HAVE to be mythology! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. There are still people who worship Zeus, Hera, Dianna, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. then fine..it should all be covered as comparative religious studies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:11 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. Nobody is objecting to that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:23 PM Response to Reply #48 |
68. I do, but for a good reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:21 PM Response to Reply #36 |
65. No, it shouldn't as the religions are not what is compared. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. It's not a "personal belief" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. I wouldn't use those words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. nope that is your personal belief...you and science can not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. In logical discourse, the claimant with the intial positive assertion is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. christianity was around before evolution was proclaimed.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cats Against Frist
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:24 PM Response to Reply #50 |
69. And they believed the sun moved around in the flat Earth's sky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
72. Evolution does not claim a god exists or doesn't exist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
42. No, science cannot disprove God. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. yes but philosophy can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #42 |
58. but most christians dont interpet the bible literally. Only a small |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:19 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:05 PM Response to Reply #58 |
192. They do when it is convenient to do so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
61. and science can't disprove the tooth fairy either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:27 PM Response to Reply #61 |
73. Tooth Fairy is good, but I prefer the IPU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frank frankly
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:44 PM Response to Reply #73 |
121. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldmund
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 10:53 AM Response to Reply #17 |
151. Are you for real??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:33 PM Response to Reply #151 |
166. a theological belief system and/or a religion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #166 |
170. What a bunch of bunk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Mon Dec-06-04 11:59 AM Response to Reply #170 |
185. like I said nobody but the most extreme atheist or fundy should have a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
24. People become upset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #24 |
39. When I discuss this with people face to face and "myth" upsets them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cats Against Frist
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
38. Here's an offensive statement: People who voted "yes" are frickin' batty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. And stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyskank
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
76. Yes it's disrespectful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. It's not stating that at all, openly or covertly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:20 PM Response to Reply #76 |
92. okay I'll buy that argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoNotRefill
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
77. I don't see how evolution can be considered to be a "fact"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #77 |
89. It's a fact because it has been observed to take place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoNotRefill
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:33 PM Response to Reply #89 |
104. you say: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 05:17 PM Response to Reply #104 |
169. A particular mutation does not have to be repeatable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smarkit
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:21 PM Response to Reply #89 |
163. Evolution IS a fact, and a theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #77 |
94. Sure we know how it works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoNotRefill
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:37 PM Response to Reply #94 |
107. It's not that simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestatepatriot
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
90. here's a simple solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:29 PM Response to Reply #90 |
98. No, no no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lilith Velkor
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
100. Science is not Dogma |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
101. I would have worded alot stronger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:42 PM Response to Reply #101 |
108. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
110. Just an aside. I occasionally use "fundie" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 06:14 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. Save me, Jebus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
114. take out mythology and it would be okay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:29 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. I'm not trying to persuade anyone. It's just a statement of fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:31 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. if you don't care, why did you ask? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:47 PM Response to Reply #117 |
123. I want to know what people think of this statement because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:11 AM Response to Reply #123 |
130. I am a Catholic and I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:04 PM Response to Reply #123 |
161. I differentiate between repecting people and respecting beliefs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuskerDem
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 11:57 PM Response to Reply #123 |
183. Then why not entitle your original post.................................. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
115. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
125. other.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 10:07 PM Response to Reply #125 |
128. as bluestatepatriot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Thu Dec-02-04 11:22 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. Who advocates banning physics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:18 AM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Creationists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 01:13 AM Response to Reply #132 |
136. thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Djinn
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:34 AM Response to Reply #129 |
133. that being the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 01:32 AM Response to Reply #133 |
137. they don't have to view it as evolution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Is Write
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
131. The statement doesn't feel disrespectful to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sgent
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 01:38 AM Response to Reply #131 |
138. Judeo-Christian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Is Write
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 09:12 AM Response to Reply #138 |
146. Did you mean this as a response to me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masaka___
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
141. We Have More Important Battles To Fight Than This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 09:11 AM Response to Reply #141 |
144. we have many battles - you are partially right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masaka___
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 03:09 PM Response to Reply #144 |
168. fair enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lawladyprof
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
143. No, not ignorant goat herders, but a product of its context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
149. not disrespectful at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DownNotOut
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
158. Religion is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #158 |
164. Is that baby alive or dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 02:23 PM Response to Reply #158 |
165. Oh, you mean like astrology. And pyramid schemes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UncleSepp
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
171. How about this rewrite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
172. The Lack of religious tolerance on DU is somewhat astounnding at times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 07:51 PM Response to Reply #172 |
174. Lack of scientific knowledge on DU is somewhat astounding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 07:55 PM Response to Reply #174 |
175. so the 80%+ of Americans who belive in God are all just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 07:59 PM Response to Reply #175 |
176. You're confusing Creationism with Christianity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 09:56 PM Response to Reply #176 |
178. Ummm NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imperialism Inc.
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 10:20 AM Response to Reply #178 |
186. Who wrote the book of Genesis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:59 PM Response to Reply #178 |
191. Oh, I don't think it's hypocritical at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:46 PM Response to Reply #176 |
202. WRONG...all christians are creationists.... and so are religious Jews and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrWeird
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #202 |
205. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
173. Whether or not it is disrespectful is irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:48 PM Response to Reply #173 |
203. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
disconnected
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
179. nope not disrespectful at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gordianot
![]() |
Fri Dec-03-04 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
180. Evolution yes. As Darwin stated it ....no. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
188. I say "No, not disrespectful" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Classic
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
189. I vote other on "semantic" grounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
193. Well.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
194. no... anyone with a real brain knows evolution is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
196. It's an incorrect statement, but it is not disrespectful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
197. well of course it is disrespectful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Tue Dec-07-04 02:32 PM Response to Reply #197 |
198. Oh Brother! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC