|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
doxieone
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:40 AM Original message |
Fox just did a direct hit on DU - related to Tsunami |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jasmeel
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
1. Fuck Fox! I wish that was a network..Sigh n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
2. Hey!!! Thanks for the free advertising!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
henslee
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Wow, get ready for increased traffic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElectroPrincess
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Please don't advertise those bozos' delusions here ... we're already aware |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
31. wooHoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. Rock on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
4. So? We do direct hits on Faux News pretty regularly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
105. Um, the difference is that Fox is supposedly a news source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. Your first post seemed to compare our Fox taunts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelOne
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
5. I guess we can expect a lot of trolls now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThorsHammer
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
76. Flip side - maybe some of them will be open minded and stick around (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txaslftist
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:16 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. Bwahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThorsHammer
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:40 PM Response to Reply #80 |
85. I said maybe; I expect mostly agitators, but some may be civil people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia_k
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #85 |
92. I'm not an agitator ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThorsHammer
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:56 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia_k
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:01 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. Thanks ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ExclamationPoint
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 08:12 PM Response to Reply #96 |
118. Welcome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caution
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
6. And once again the media uses a single crackpot to define the rest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeeBGBz
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
98. They are using that angle because it's working |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
99. And let's not mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. Obviously we have become a threat!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:44 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yep this is good news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. We are a threat to their talking points world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:56 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. A threat or an easy target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:18 PM Response to Reply #22 |
49. "First they ignore you, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mad_Dem_X
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #49 |
88. That's my new email signature line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fiona
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #49 |
100. ah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilber_Stool
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
34. Yup!.....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pam-Moby
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 07:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
113. That is my feelings as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neweurope
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
9. DU has become a force that matters. First the NYT, now Fox. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
11. So Fox is expending resources to monitor DU ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Fox is probably sending posters to DU to post crazy stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Exactly! Beware! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:47 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I heard that comment and my ears picked up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. No. they're monitoring what FR says about DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
15. Page banner takes care of that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. don`t do that he`d probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
37. I would have to share with his head anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
18. Did they show the DU front page? Or just give a link to the website? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
henslee
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
19. First NYT, then Fox. This is huge. Welcome to the big game, Skinner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
20. DU should wear that as a badge of honor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
21. FREE ADVERTISING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
51. Bingo (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator
![]() ![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
23. We're aware of this, and we're prepared to deal with them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jesus H. Christ
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
24. Was it fair and balanced? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doxieone
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Neither fair or balanced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 07:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
114. ARE there wild rumors about the disastor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
25. Gee, I hope Fox had copyright permission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:03 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. We do a pretty good job of debunking the tinfoil hats right here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:06 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. like the GOV's 'official' 911 story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Fox doesn't care; they just want to plant the meme; "DU = nutcakes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WoodrowFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #29 |
65. Actually the NYT DID point that out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #65 |
74. I stand corrected, thanks. The NYT was "relatively fair" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WoodrowFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:18 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. it wasn't FAUXISH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #65 |
102. That's impressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
75. I imagine whatever they said fell under "fair use." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
28. Don't think about Bill O'Reilly with his vibrator stuck up his a$$... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. rotflmao!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
47. Bill O'Reilly *IS* their vibrator.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #47 |
64. I'll see your vibrator and raise you two glasses of wine and a loofa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arkie dem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
72. It's about time O'Reilly fields a question from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 07:51 PM Response to Reply #28 |
115. LOL! LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
32. The corporate media is threatened by alternative news sites. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
35. First, they ignore you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DSperoRN
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 05:35 PM Response to Reply #35 |
106. Most People Aren't Paranoid Enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WoodrowFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 09:20 PM Response to Reply #106 |
125. in many cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUDUing2
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
36. and we care about this why? Fox news is not reliable/reputable news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
39. Deleted message |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
59. If the Brit Hume Bobblehead gang laughed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libnnc
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
40. Again, here we go with the framing the debate thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. We don't fight it. We let them fight it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:16 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. You don't. Fox has no credibility anyway. People will see the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
42. Hey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
44. Hi Mom! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
46. ** THIS IS EMBARRASSING *** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:26 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. What exactly is embarrassing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. I am embarassed that DUers still fall for the propaganda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. What Propaganda? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WoodrowFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:50 PM Response to Reply #52 |
68. the crackpots (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arwalden
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:41 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. Thanks For The Advice, Sterling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 07:56 PM Response to Reply #62 |
116. The REAL question here, arwalden, is the Soviet/Orwellian one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #53 |
69. Permanent thread on the homepage ridiculing right-wing conspiracy theories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DSperoRN
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 06:02 PM Response to Reply #69 |
107. Right-wing Conspiracy Theories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 08:29 PM Response to Reply #107 |
122. There isn't much truth to the Arkansas body count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:03 PM Response to Reply #46 |
77. Why be embarrassed by what Fox viewers think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:41 PM Response to Reply #77 |
87. Considering most of them still think we found WMD's in Iraq ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:43 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. LOL...it's like having someone throw a ball of yarn at us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
48. It's great that I don't have to search DU for these obscure posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:31 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Really where is that thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #58 |
66. I have. It was this past weekend, maybe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
79. It's in the Science Forum Now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnyCanuck
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
50. Fox goes to court to defend the right to knowingly lie to the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SweetLeftFoot
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:57 PM Response to Reply #50 |
70. In the UK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:06 PM Response to Reply #50 |
78. The other part of this is that a reporter can be fired for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
81. Disseminating false news is a crime IN CANADA (I think) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
54. The real cause of the earthquake that started the tsunami. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. LOL. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrary1
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:47 PM Response to Reply #54 |
67. But you missed perhaps the most important ingredient... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 08:11 PM Response to Reply #54 |
117. Nope - it was bunker buster blown by Roger Ailes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
57. Funny I have heard some REALLY outrageous things SAID on Fox News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sherilocks
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
60. 'Scuse me folks while I head out to paste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
63. Cool! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
73. Why don't RWers ever talk about my posts ? Oh yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imax2268
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
83. Hey Faux Snews... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
txaslftist
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
84. Is this their way of saying we've arrived? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carni
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 08:18 PM Response to Reply #84 |
120. In defense of some of the *tin foil* above mentioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
86. If They Liked That, They Will Love The 'Chem Trails' Theories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomKoolzip
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:51 PM Response to Reply #86 |
94. Nice idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donkeyboy75
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 06:49 PM Response to Reply #94 |
111. Get your conspiracy theories straight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
90. So What? They believed Dubya when he said there were WMD . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IHeart1993
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
91. You know you've reached big time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porkrind
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
93. They are scared of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
97. Didn't Fox claim NASA never went to the moon? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 03:32 PM Response to Reply #97 |
101. They did the "Martian Autopsy" too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
103. Does that mean that the "media" is directly competing with blogs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secedeeconomically
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
104. The hypocrisy at Fox is amazing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
109. They try to discredit democraticunderground.com but say nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
112. Alright! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I_Luv_Mao
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
119. Fox is the Devil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WoodrowFan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 09:22 PM Response to Reply #119 |
126. darn, missed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ExclamationPoint
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
121. I would burst in anger if I took faux news seriously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shesemsmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
123. I just came in to see if there was anything on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-05 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
124. Here's the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dangerman
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-05 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
127. Alright! Now I'm OFFICALLY PISSED OFF AT FOX NEWS!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Jun 20th 2024, 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC