|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Deb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:01 PM Original message |
FOX Calls FCC Indecency Rules 'Obsolete' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. More like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Kinda like the RW Catholic pro-lifers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oh what an uncomfortable position to be in.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Wasn't O'Reilly suggesting torches and pitchforks over Nipplegate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. I don't agree with the new enforcement of the obscenity laws... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Some of the rules ARE obsolete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. But there should still be a ban on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. that's the "old" list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Funny thing is, half-bleeped words that leave no doubt what you are saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. They PLACE little starbursts??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kweerwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-05 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. Indecency rules? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Sep 27th 2024, 03:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC