|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
nickshepDEM
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 01:59 AM Original message |
If the Republicans get 60 in 2006... HOW SCREWED WOULD WE BE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. How screwed do you need to be to feel screwed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Absolutely screwed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickshepDEM
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. LoL Im feeling screwed but Im keeping hope alive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSgt213
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
3. Very. Might as well get the new Flags with Corporate Stars and Stripes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:16 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. You mean like this???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MSgt213
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:18 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yea, I need to get one to store in my closet just in case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
5. not anymore than we are now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Calanus
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:12 AM Response to Original message |
7. Doubleplusgood screwed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrongbadTehAwesome
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 05:16 AM Response to Reply #7 |
32. yeah, I think you've got it exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueFlu
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
10. Judge Roy Moore would either be in the DC Court of Appeals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:42 AM Response to Original message |
11. after 2006 elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Zanti Regent
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
12. Mike Malloy says this IS what will happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. i love mike malloy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
13. I look at the list of senate seats up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 03:51 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. We need to work for a modest 2-3 seat gain in '06 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ribrepin
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I think Cantwell's vulnerable in Washington State |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:48 AM Response to Original message |
14. What if they get 66? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 03:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. They need 3/4ths of the state legislatures to approve ammendments, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 10:44 AM Response to Reply #18 |
29. And if those go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. State legislative chambers are rougly 50/50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:35 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Well, I hope you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:02 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Aaaiiiiieeeeee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlemingsGhost
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
15. If? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apple_ridge
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 09:12 AM Response to Reply #15 |
27. You are absolutely correct. It's a done deal already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Mouse
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
16. You are thinking too small |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:11 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. if there is extreme internet censorship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Town Jake
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 04:32 AM Response to Original message |
23. Off-year congressional elections... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skarbrowe
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:01 AM Response to Original message |
24. I braved my second post starter on this very subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 05:16 AM Response to Original message |
25. Don't be placing all your hopes in the filibuster basket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
26. Deleted message |
leftchick
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-05 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
28. hello?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC