|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:29 AM Original message |
Have you benefited from a Bush policy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. I did get a tax rebate in 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Yeah, I got that rebate too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
58. But at what cost the rebate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kashka-Kat
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #58 |
68. it was a wash- property taxes increased to cover shortfall at local level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. And you're probably actually lucky that there was a wash... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
76. NOOOO!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bouncy Ball
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. I honestly can't think of a thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Osamasux
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Nope, that $300 came from the Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
42. Sorry, but that is false |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Osamasux
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:36 PM Response to Reply #42 |
56. I'm pretty sure I remember it correctly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
72. Your link agrees with what I said too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kashka-Kat
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
74. Actually it was a loan from China .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
3. I thought this was a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. You hit it on the head, not a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtanarchist
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. What makes this a problem with our judicial system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtanarchist
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:03 AM Response to Reply #14 |
24. I don't think the insurers are increasing payments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bling bling
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 03:32 AM Response to Reply #14 |
101. How soon will you feel the relief from this tort reform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. it's a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:02 AM Response to Reply #13 |
23. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
83. isn't a real problem that we need a reform of the medical system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
62. And why is the answer to high malpractice insurance rates always |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 01:46 AM Response to Reply #62 |
86. citing examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 09:33 AM Response to Reply #86 |
102. But the solution you propose is one sided. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-05 01:22 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Well, in fact we do police ourselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
94. Is that 80,000 or 800,000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 10:50 AM Response to Reply #3 |
53. I'm sorry $350 milliion is still a joke... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 03:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
99. deleted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Osamasux
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. Not really, when all things are considered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
7. No, I haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:43 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. The poster above hit it right off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtanarchist
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Tort reform will help your malpractice payments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Yes and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairOne
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:59 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Want lower medmal insurance? Get rid of mistake-prone doctors... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:11 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Thanks for the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairOne
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:20 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. And iirc, most of those reports there have extensive bibliographies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Freeing doctors from accountability does not equal tort reform. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairOne
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:43 AM Response to Reply #38 |
45. Sure trial lawyers make huge amounts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
64. But the solution you support DOES free docs from accountability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairOne
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:09 PM Response to Reply #64 |
78. Good try, but in the end, wouldn't work.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:33 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. I take your point, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairOne
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:42 PM Response to Reply #80 |
81. If nothing else, I guess I'm a fan of going to the source of the problem.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 01:36 AM Response to Reply #78 |
85. But..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 11:05 AM Response to Reply #85 |
103. But the tort reform that exists in CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-05 01:29 AM Response to Reply #103 |
106. I understand your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Osamasux
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. I have a feeling Edwards' approach would have been better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:24 AM Response to Reply #18 |
33. I have mixed feeling about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phylny
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
61. Are you certain that NO cases of CP are caused by medical malpractice? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairOne
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:22 PM Response to Reply #33 |
79. Runaway jury awards are a gop/doctors myth. /eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuttyFluffers
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 03:00 AM Response to Reply #8 |
48. if you don't know who to blame then you need to do your homework |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleBallots
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
10. nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShinerTX
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
12. I'm not the top 1%, so I haven't got a thing. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
15. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aeolian
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
16. The Do-Not-Call list rocks! (when it works) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megawatt
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:36 AM Response to Reply #16 |
43. The "do not call " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 10:32 AM Response to Reply #43 |
52. I'm definitely O.K. with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Osamasux
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #43 |
57. I am okay with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aeolian
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:16 PM Response to Reply #43 |
66. Perfectly OK with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
65. The "Do Not Call" List was not Bush's idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aeolian
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Right, that was kinda my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrwellwasRight
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aeolian
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. LOL! Good point! (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
82. Darn right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sonicx
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
17. Not a thing. the 'tax cut' went to pay for my higher college tuition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conflictgirl
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 03:21 AM Response to Reply #17 |
50. Same here. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
22. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:03 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Thanks for an honest answer. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:11 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I'm not trying to offend you. I hate *. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:16 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. No offense here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:19 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Sorry, over-reaction on my part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:07 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. My wife is a Brit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:18 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. I'm a Brit, and I live in London. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:28 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. My wife was born and raised in London. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:40 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. An Essex Girl? :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:53 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I'd ask her but she retired. No not Essex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:56 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Man, you're welcome to this country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:10 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:09 PM Response to Reply #39 |
54. The only thing I can think of is oil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnOneillsMemory
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
40. I've learned all about the history and psychology of fascism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:24 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I just had to reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:41 AM Response to Original message |
44. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrCorday
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
46. I've benefited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phylny
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:04 PM Response to Reply #46 |
63. Interesting post, thanks. And... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 01:56 AM Response to Reply #46 |
87. Mixed reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
47. No, but we've been hurt by lots of things Bush has done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrongbadTehAwesome
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 03:18 AM Response to Original message |
49. directly, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulie5
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 03:32 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. In answer to the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:46 PM Response to Reply #51 |
75. Not for the greedy rich in this Country he's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
55. Nope. None has benefitted me, and his policies have done more to take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phylny
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
59. We got a whopping $600 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bear425
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
60. I'm getting fewer phone solicitations due to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Misunderestimator
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
73. Yes, my income tax is slightly lower... but I would give it all back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amazona
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-05 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
77. yeah the savings and loan collapse (Bush I) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 01:25 AM Response to Original message |
84. What the hell, kick it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
88. HA HA, HA HA HA HA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malmapus
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
89. Lessie I'm making less than half of what I was when he came into office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:15 AM Response to Original message |
90. The tax cut from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FM Arouet666
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:26 AM Response to Reply #90 |
93. But not enough to vote repug? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
91. Deleted message |
mhr
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
92. Unemployed 55 Months - You Can Accurately Imagine My Reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:36 AM Response to Original message |
95. I haven't benefited at all under bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
96. Our lives are being crushed because of the Neocon agenda.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indie Media Magazine
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
97. I have benefitted from a Bush Policy. I was able to buy ASSAULT WEAPONS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Mouse
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
98. I'm really, really enjoying the Daily Show! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 03:22 AM Response to Original message |
100. Thank the good lord Jesus that Bush wont let fags get married! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-05 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
104. I will, as soon as I get over being an American |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-05 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
107. We got a big tax cut, and wasted it on Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeeYiYi
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-05 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
108. I've been enjoying the internets. ...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muse
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-05 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
109. I can't think of anything that he's done that has benefited anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-05 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
110. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Jun 19th 2024, 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC