Dangerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-05 09:41 AM
Original message |
| F9/11 not for Oscars, but Razzies |
ET Awful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I believe it wasn't submitted for an Oscar, so could not be nominated |
|
As to the Razzies, F 9/11 is not in the running, but George Bush, Don Rumsfeld and Condie Rice are for worst performance.
That would actually be a compliment to the film, as it shows the three of them as the loons that they are.
|
AllegroRondo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-05 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Moore pulled it from the documentary category |
|
and it really didnt stand a chance in the main category.
|
DrGonzoLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Do people even bothering actually READING anything? |
|
:eyes:
Bush was nominated for a Razzie, not F9/11.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 10th 2026, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |