|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
laura888
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:54 PM Original message |
Randi Rhodes is hinting she believes in LIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. said it outright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
screembloodymurder
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
47. Me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm sure she believes it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Protagoras
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
108. I've been a pretty strong doubter till yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
latteromden
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm a little behind the times here, I guess - LIHOP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Let It Happen On Purpose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
138. All about PNAC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Let It Happen On Purpose! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:35 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Its sure looking like that's what happened....... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ailsagirl
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
88. It's perfectly in keeping with their sadism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cushla_machree
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
115. sometimes i believe it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
53. Join the Grassy Knoll Society! (I'm a charter member.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:23 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. What's the Grassy Knoll Society... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. It has a LIHOP Chapter and a MIHOP Chapter ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:33 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. I already belong to both of those clubs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:37 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. It comes from a disparaging remark Ari Fleischer made during a press ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. For years I thought it was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:45 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. Thank you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventythree
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:17 AM Response to Reply #68 |
135. heck, I just thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
summitch
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:55 PM Response to Reply #68 |
168. Evil Ari? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yes, I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. We are eaten up with stupid throngs in denial about everrything that has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. 52 warnings that were ignored...Not so...Ashcroft took them seriously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
64. Yes, and an interesting question would be: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 07:12 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. Who would trust a lawyer with a secret? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:12 PM Response to Reply #64 |
81. Who says he was? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 02:35 AM Response to Reply #64 |
147. Maybe he wasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #147 |
163. I know this may be a stretch...but he DID remarry rather quickly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolinian
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
102. Now that's a good point. Surely there's a record of their movements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. In light of 52 warnings, who could turn their backs on the possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aden_nak
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. Someone has to say it first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 03:57 AM Response to Reply #8 |
153. ALSO doesn't hurt that they mentioned the 'axis of evil' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
165. Oh God...he DID say that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. Several Callers on Local Talk Radio mentioned LIHOP and MIHIOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jean
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:18 PM Original message |
the right continually dilutes any attack with the 'conspiracy theory' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
140. I have trust in Reid and Dean on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
181. The reality folks need to attack the phrase "conspiracy theory" head on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
10. At the very least they Let it Happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forintegrity
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
112. Thank you , thank you, thank you!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:25 AM Response to Reply #112 |
141. I even think Bush senior had a plan on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 04:15 AM Response to Reply #141 |
154. PAPA BUSH AND NEW WORLD ORDER ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:31 PM Response to Reply #112 |
166. You are not alone! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
134. Agree, at the least it was gross negligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
171. Set up the scenario in which 9/11 could occur and then egged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 08:46 PM Response to Reply #171 |
180. That's why he didn't panic and skip out on My Pet Goat: He knew! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plato_Archanes
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
11. Not a good thing to admit before seeing a surgeon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:50 PM Original message |
google "wtc 7" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
43. LIHOP/+DoubleCross |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. There are no former CIA operatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:51 PM Response to Reply #46 |
114. well.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:17 PM Response to Reply #43 |
82. I think that is a valid theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:27 AM Response to Reply #43 |
142. I thought I read somewhere on one of these post's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mordarlar
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 04:55 AM Response to Reply #142 |
158. BIN LADEN INTERVIEW... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nostradammit
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 05:18 AM Response to Reply #43 |
159. I disagree - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ignatius 2
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 09:35 AM Response to Reply #159 |
162. What are you talking about? The deer in the headlights look was when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melynn
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
122. I believe the scenario |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:29 AM Response to Reply #122 |
143. Probably because of Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xpat
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
12. Zbigniew Brzezinski was calling for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carpe diem
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. whether he called for it or not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
105. Brzezinski is in bed with those fellows. Has been from the start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ignatius 2
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:39 PM Response to Reply #105 |
111. Cold blooded monster..Give the Soviet Union their Vietnam and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Protagoras
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
109. I recently read that book and was immediately struck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
14. I've been of the opinion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. took me a little longer than you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:32 AM Response to Reply #19 |
145. I started thinking after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
93. The minute I saw it I told my husband |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lostnote03
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:06 AM Response to Reply #93 |
125. Tinoire....You stated my exact words as well....sorry for the late respons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:50 AM Response to Reply #125 |
128. What made you be looking for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lostnote03
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #128 |
164. I was not drawn to one revealing incident, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 09:13 PM Response to Reply #164 |
182. Lostnote03 - I don't get what you're saying about Enron/Baxter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lostnote03
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 11:31 PM Response to Reply #182 |
183. Zan....Thanks for the heads up..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stirringstill
![]() |
Sun Feb-13-05 02:17 AM Response to Reply #182 |
184. Enron was going down as early as summer at least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Sun Feb-13-05 10:01 PM Response to Reply #184 |
186. Operative phrase is "we now know" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #93 |
178. That is exactly what I said as I watched the second plane hit the WTC from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. two ground to air missille launchers installed on hotel roof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstans
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. I think they knew about it and didn't do anything to stop it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
17. is it just me, or has opinion on 911 lihop/mihop changed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ignatius 2
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. These are all so recent, we had threads here from day one and each and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:04 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. That forum still exists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ignatius 2
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:20 PM Response to Reply #41 |
55. Thank you so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:44 PM Response to Reply #55 |
85. It is a huge mistake for mods to move and delete this discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #85 |
100. Delete, yes. Move, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:55 AM Response to Reply #100 |
130. Deleted??!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:33 AM Response to Reply #130 |
146. I don't know if any have been deleted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. Here's some older threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:50 PM Response to Reply #50 |
70. OMG thanks for posting those! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:47 PM Response to Reply #70 |
86. Amazing is it not? So why does it get suppressed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:23 PM Response to Reply #50 |
99. Those were good discussions! Thanks for posting those links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio-Active
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:20 PM Response to Reply #99 |
119. great album.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 02:45 AM Response to Reply #119 |
148. Something told me not to write it that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:50 PM Response to Reply #40 |
89. Those were the days when DU really came to life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsTryska
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
18. I've been hearig her hint for the past couples weeks on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
21. How could one think of it any other way after seeing what Bush DID that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. ...Not to mention the weeks preceding 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
understandinglife
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:48 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Precisely. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:45 AM Response to Reply #21 |
127. Actually, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
24. Thank you Randi! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
linazelle
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
25. She's talked about this ad infinitum...nothing new there n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
26. I emailed her to show support. Here is my personal take again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. LIHOP ?- Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trish1168
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. I've been thinking this too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. I never read your previous posting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Well, it usually is in a thread that gets bumped to the 9/11 Forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demigoddess
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
113. probably the "we must not cause a panic" excuse. they saw it coming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SiouxJ
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
175. I've always thought LIHOP but didn't think it would be that bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yes, I'm listening to Randi, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:50 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I haven't heard Bernie this week... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:04 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Yes, Bernie's been on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sickinohio
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:12 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Don't mean to sound dumb or anything - but what is MIHOP and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:17 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Made It Happen on Purpose &... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Make It Happen On Purpose & Project for New American Century: GOOD LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Please see upthread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:42 PM Response to Reply #48 |
66. Here's the Demopedia background link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sickinohio
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:45 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Thanks for the help - I think LIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:57 AM Response to Reply #48 |
131. PNAC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. Bernie jumps on board, but then tends to fall off... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shredr
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
31. What surgery is Randi going in for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 07:27 PM Response to Reply #31 |
75. hysterectomy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:59 AM Response to Reply #75 |
132. Now, this is going to sound paranoid but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shredr
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #75 |
179. My prayers are with her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
32. Malloy pretty much said that last night too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redherring
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
34. I will never have the guts to call Randi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. You're right.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laura888
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
59. agreed. She has a wide audience... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
37. She has said so for two days now, but I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
39. I never believed in LIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I never believed in LIHOP either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #44 |
69. I wonder sometimes if they kept Doofus boy in the dark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:02 AM Response to Reply #69 |
133. I suspect strongly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:26 PM Response to Reply #39 |
57. Please see my post #26 above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
83. A lot of things were unimaginable before Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
106. Become as cynical in what you believe they're capable of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
61. She's been LIHOP for a while, AFAICT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat Dragon
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
120. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number_6
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
62. Some basic unanswered questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number_6
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:42 PM Response to Reply #62 |
104. numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBHam
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:05 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. More properly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
What Is This Crap
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
71. vote for goldmine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GetTheRightVote
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
72. I believe in LIHOP as well, the emails are spelling it out for us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanboggie
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
73. Called it then too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
76. Randi tells it like it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:08 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. and what about tower 7 "being pulled"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:48 PM Response to Reply #78 |
87. WTC7 -------------------------------------> mpg & flash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:07 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. yep, exactly. planned demolition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:07 PM Response to Reply #78 |
91. Watch this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. EXCELLENT VIDEO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:11 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. Never underestimate the gross incompetence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:23 PM Response to Reply #80 |
98. Great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:38 PM Response to Reply #80 |
103. "the NORAD deal" allowed us to respond more RAPIDLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:08 PM Response to Reply #103 |
116. I don't mean to be dismissive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 03:31 AM Response to Reply #116 |
149. a born skeptic wouldn't buy the official coincidence theory... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 10:36 PM Response to Reply #80 |
110. Deleted message |
smoogatz
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:15 PM Response to Reply #110 |
118. This isn't news to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:30 PM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Innocent civilian lives mean nothing to criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 03:40 AM Response to Reply #118 |
150. OPERATION NORTHWOODS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 05:51 AM Response to Reply #118 |
160. news to MANY - a NEW perl harbor IS required (PNAC) to hasten the PLAN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:01 PM Response to Reply #160 |
170. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:59 PM Response to Reply #118 |
176. Ye they themselves acknowledge they needed a new pearl harbor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justiceischeap
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
77. I too have been saying from the beginning that it was LIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Minus World
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
79. And Why Not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
84. I believe it's either LIHOP or MIHOP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Corgigal
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
90. Controlled airspace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:13 PM Response to Reply #90 |
94. Wow great post thank you!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Corgigal
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #94 |
101. I did do one radio interview |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:51 AM Response to Reply #90 |
129. Great post! Thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:21 AM Response to Reply #90 |
139. whoa...I wondered how they "lost track" of those freaking JETS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 04:31 AM Response to Reply #90 |
155. AA flt 11 passed over a twa flight in air during hijacking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlaGranny
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:38 PM Response to Reply #90 |
174. I used to work at a NORAD base also - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
95. Deleted message |
journalist3072
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
97. I agree with Randi on LIHOP n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lala_rawraw
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
117. No, I think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuvor
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
123. Does she say WHY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpilgrim
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 03:43 AM Response to Reply #123 |
151. she cited many pieces of evidence, as she always does ----------> MP3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lala_rawraw
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:48 PM Response to Reply #123 |
167. How much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Fri Feb-11-05 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
124. There was a time I would have thought all of you were loony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 04:35 AM Response to Reply #124 |
156. i am MIHOP ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
126. I've been thinking along these lines for about half a year or so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
136. I've thought that since day 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
137. I'm not sure if I heard this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:31 AM Response to Reply #137 |
144. Let it happen on purpose LIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 03:51 AM Response to Original message |
152. I myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 05:57 AM Response to Reply #152 |
161. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pooka Fey
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 04:54 AM Response to Original message |
157. MIHOP. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBHam
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
169. punt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlaGranny
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
172. I used to listen to Randi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
173. I think RR really believes MIHOP... She smart cookie. Knows all action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1
![]() |
Sat Feb-12-05 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
177. !LIHOP 100%! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stirringstill
![]() |
Sun Feb-13-05 03:58 AM Response to Original message |
185. Waking up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Jun 18th 2024, 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC