|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:13 PM Original message |
Is anyone bothered that gays can marry in Vermont? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kanrok
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. nope n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Don't they just have civil unions in VT? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imenja
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 04:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
57. yes, there is no legal marriage for gays in VT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsConduct
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. No, I don't see how that should bother anyone. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Well, it's certainly good to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. I missed the Carville-Matalin thread - Carville has outlived his best day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:34 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. "why should it matter to anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:28 AM Response to Reply #30 |
46. Have a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsConduct
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 04:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
54. I missed the Carville-Matalin thread also. I think I saw the title, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kittenpants
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 01:35 PM Response to Reply #54 |
68. I didn't think it was all that serious of a thread, more of a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsConduct
![]() |
Tue Mar-15-05 01:40 PM Response to Reply #68 |
97. Thanks for the edification. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LosinIt
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not worried a bit, because they can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. Nope n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. no-don`t really give a shit one way or the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikepallas
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. No. But it bothers me that they cannot marry anywhere else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Massachusetts has Marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. New Jersey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikepallas
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:31 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. A step in the right direction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikepallas
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. I thought Mass, VT, and Calif where under dispute. I stand corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
11. I'm Bothered That They Can't Marry Everywhere !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. No, but they can't. They only have civil unions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
13. Maple syrup from Vermont should have new label standards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightTrain
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
14. As long as they can't marry in my state, Vermont can do whatever it wants! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hand
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
15. Funny thing about same-sex marriage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:25 PM Original message |
"It's no one's business but theirs", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flammable Materials
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'm detecting a certain snideness in the initial comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. It's a thread in GD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kedrys
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
18. Other than I'm going to have to truck all the way up to VT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
More Than A Feeling
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. It's destroying my non-existent marriage! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. Not at all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
osiristz
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
26. Nope, not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mich Otter
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
29. Marriage ought to be all about people being in love... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. well it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
31. I'm bothered that the question even arises, as if it should be subject to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:45 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Exactly my point, why should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
32. I say Marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:42 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bush_Blows
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
36. I am bothered that they CANNOT marry anywhere else. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
37. My marriage is deteriorating by the minute... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
38. Western Civilization ended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PowerToThePeople
![]() |
Sun Mar-13-05 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
39. I am bothered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rush1184
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
40. well, republicans apparently are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kire
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
41. Ignored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
42. Yes. It bothers me very much. I can't sleep at night thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
43. Since learning that gays can marry in Vermont... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlaGranny
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 03:12 PM Response to Reply #43 |
71. I think right wingnuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
44. Doesn't it threaten marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
45. marriage will always seem dirty to me now.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cry baby
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
47. Not bothered at all nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spiffarino
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:57 AM Response to Original message |
48. It bothers me that gay people can marry in Vermont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dxstone
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
49. Carville doesn't mind, but Matalin would prefer to see gay people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aaronnyc
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 01:32 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Actually Mary Matalin supports gay rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dxstone
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 03:03 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Damn! And my title line was so funny too! Curses! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dxstone
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 03:33 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. ps: i still gots my suspicions, though! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 11:48 AM Response to Reply #53 |
62. I have known many "interpolitical" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dxstone
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 05:14 PM Response to Reply #62 |
79. ...can't disagree with you there... wait! yes I can! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
50. Gays can get married anywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 04:15 AM Response to Original message |
55. Bothers me they can in Vermont and not in California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 04:19 AM Response to Original message |
56. Gays can't get married in Vermont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caledesi
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 05:44 AM Response to Original message |
58. Sure. Every minute of the day I am distracted by the thought. LOL! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KayLaw
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. I'm with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dxstone
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 04:21 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. Love that understatement, kay! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KayLaw
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 07:02 PM Response to Reply #75 |
86. Pretty silly stuff, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
59. The can marry in Mass., not VT. I'm happy my state is so progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paineinthearse
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
60. Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catamount
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
61. Certainly not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
63. civil unions are good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
64. Not in the least. Just about anyone can marry in VT, if anyone is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
65. OMG, so THAT'S why i'm getting a divorce! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPBasher
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
66. Well they can't, it's just civil unions, but to answer your question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clem_c_rock
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
67. No - and if you are I think there should be a law that says you're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 06:35 PM Response to Reply #67 |
82. Ummm........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clem_c_rock
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 07:07 PM Response to Reply #82 |
88. Of course I knew - it was a great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lies and propaganda
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
70. i just mind that its so damn cold... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jokinomx
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
72. Not at All.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
73. Nope. Doesn't bother me or my hubby. Congrats to Vermont. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
74. Was it Jerry Falwell who said happily married Gays will roam the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taxloss
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
76. Yes, enormously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyLover
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
77. Marriage in Vermont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Deuteronomy
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
78. As long as they don;t marry me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 06:23 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. What Makes You Think They'd Be Interested??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Deuteronomy
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 06:39 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. HAHAHAHAHAAH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 06:50 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. LOL !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
81. Nope. I couldn't care less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
84. I can't even get a date, so why should I care who gets married where? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colorado Blue
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
87. Of course not. I am getting really angry at the victimization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlyvi
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
89. YES!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
90. I live in an artsy community in Vt. that has lots of Gays and I've never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
91. no -- anyone who is honoring TLC (Tolerance Love and Commitment) is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
th2techdude
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 07:54 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntiBush
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
93. Nope. Does not bother me a bit, nor in any state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheOriginalAmerican
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
94. Not at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shimmergal
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
95. No. Why should it bother me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Mon Mar-14-05 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
96. No, I am very happy about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC