ZombieNixon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-05 03:27 PM
Original message |
| Y'know, as popes go, John Paul II was fairly good... |
|
Edited on Sat Apr-02-05 03:31 PM by ZombieNixon
I'm not Catholic, and I certainly had my disagreements with him, especially on abortion/gay marriage, etc., but he did more for world peace than almost all world leaders in the last twenty years. He contributed more to the fall of Communism than Ronald Reagan and he was at least consistent in his pro-life position (anti-abortion, but also anti-death penalty).
He seemed to be getting more conservative with age and as his health deteriorated, so by then perhaps had less control of issues than he previously did; perhaps someone else was pulling the strings. If that was the case, it does not bode well for the next papacy. We can only hope Cardinal Ratzinger doesn't get it.
|
hippiepunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. The best one could hope for |
etherealtruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. He admitted and apologized for... |
|
...some of the wrong doing of the Church and was a voice for peace... There definitely could have been worse.
|
Midnight Rambler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Some of his positions seem to be very conservative to many people here, but by Catholic Church standars, the man was downright revolutionary.
|
_TJ_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. He was a truly moral man |
|
But he was pretty conservative. I think he wanted to roll back Vatican II
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Feb 23rd 2026, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message |