|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
johncoby2
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:29 AM Original message |
Bill Clinton 2008. WOW was he good on meet the press! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justyce
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. I wish... he's one of the only ones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yes he really was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah, he often does pretty well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Yeah, it's surprising he had time to be on the program. Did he have an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
4. He is still the best politician in our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. He is a GREAT politician personally but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:53 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. How is "real liberalism" different than what Clinton tried for - if you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Clinton failed to address the core problems of Wealth and Power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:12 AM Response to Reply #10 |
19. respectfully, I think this is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:46 AM Response to Reply #19 |
27. I respectfull also disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:58 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I think to make your case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 03:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. See my post below to Elmer regarding "free trade" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. One other comment with regard to the RW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 03:30 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. The Bushies arejust a meaner version of DLC policies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. If the previous two posts are examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:55 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. You want debate? I haven't got time now but there's plenty of substance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. When you have time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 03:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
34. They're not "talking points" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Nafta was pushed because it saved Mexico - we gave up a few jobs to save |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 08:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. NAFTAi s merely one part of a much bigger pattern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 08:32 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. I agree as to trade agreements up to Nafta -but I believe Nafta was a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 08:56 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. The problem is we get rolled too often |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 09:04 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. I agree :-( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Ok lets talk about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 08:24 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. It is complex -- but there is a simple truth too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:32 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. social apathy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 12:13 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Style and substance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 04:07 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Nafta was needed for Mexico, and HMO universal was what the insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. remember when we had a president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. Got any substance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
7. He's also on George Stephanopolus. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
8. I saw him on LK Friday night and on his summit last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
13. If the shrub is the standard we measure by now, then any of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unrepuke
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
14. Huh? When? I'm watching MTP now (Sun a.m.) and no Bill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drduffy
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
17. as far as I can tell he remains |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
18. Excellent. One unfortunate line and one unfortunate fact, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
20. Clinton is admired worldwide and at home by this loyal Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
23. No, thanks. How about a member of the CBC instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
39. Problem with that is no one would watch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
24. So much more intelligent than dubya? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. lol. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
medeak
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
25. miss having a smart guy talk policy n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 12:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Oh, yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
31. Clinton haters please catch the replay on MSNBC. Here's a chance for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drummo
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Clinton and his wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. It's not a matter of "hating" Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Let's call them "Clinton detractors." As for Newt Gingrich, he doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 08:30 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. I come not to praise Newt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 09:38 PM Response to Reply #47 |
55. I'm convinced things would've been different if Clinton wasn't hamstrung |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 04:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. What idea that Clinton did not push was not also a non-starter politically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 08:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Echoing the corporate view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 08:55 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. We agree on many things here, but Clinton could not stop some things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 09:05 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. I'm not just blaming Clinton -- It's a larger issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 09:25 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Thanks - and I agree spirit of real liberalism/progressive reform needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jayctravis
![]() |
Sun Sep-18-05 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
53. He can't, but he would be perfect for UN Ambassador. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC