|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:29 PM Original message |
Heard an interesting theory today about miers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's my guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Call me dumb but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 09:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. whose gonna tell her she has to? Roberts? Scalia? Who? Who? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 09:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Scalia refused to recuse himself in the case of how the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. No, I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunny planet
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 09:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I was responding to the OP when I said yup. I think * is hoping Miers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 10:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Oops, sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh, but the stink.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. I still think it could be a shot across the bow - from Bush to neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. bush is mad at the neocons for the war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WearyOne
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Bush is just mad..is a more certain theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. I saw someone spout that theory just after the holidays to explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
henslee
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. Surely if an impechment trial went to scotus with Miers on the bench, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. An impeachment trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
henslee
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Ahhh. My ignorance revealed. But then what would be the advantage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 09:05 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. None in my opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. She would have nothing to do with it, the Chief Justice presides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't know about treason, but definitely to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Ok - please explain to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard D
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. Something just occured to me.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Makes sense to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 09:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. Yeah, well, "crazy" is the operative word these days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintmax
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. I didn't know she was his personal attorney! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Tue Oct-11-05 08:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. How does her being on the SC protect him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fri Jun 14th 2024, 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC