limbaugh: "Left Sets Up for Bush Impeachment"

sabra

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-24-05 04:23 PM
Original message

limbaugh: "Left Sets Up for Bush Impeachment"

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102405/content/see_i_told_you_so.guest.html

Left Sets Up for Bush Impeachment

October 24, 2005

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Have you noticed, folks, how prosecutors who investigate Republicans are always so brilliant, so incorruptible, but prosecutors who investigate Democrats are hacks with an agenda, like Ken Starr? I think it was Chuck Schumer who said of Patrick Fitzgerald, "This guy is a prosecutor's prosecutor." It’s like somebody says "a man's man." This is a prosecutor's prosecutor, and they're putting out there that he's "apolitical." He's a Republican, but he's "apolitical." I mean, there's no politics going on here -- and in fact the Washington Post today, in a story by Peter Slevin and Carol Leonnig: "Inquiry as Exacting as Special Counsel Is." We have here a piece basically defending Patrick Fitzgerald and how nonpartisan he is. So all this is being done to set up whatever he does this week. I'm told that Hurricane Fitzgerald is going to hit on Wednesday, Tuesday or Wednesday. It could have hit today. Don't know if it's going to be a category four, category five, category ten, but it's going to be a wallapaloozer. There's going to be a lot of wind out there.

There are too many leaks, folks, it seems to me. I don't want to name any names, but it seems like some lawyers are leaking things. Even now seems like some of the prosecutors are beginning to leak things, but somebody is so confident that they know what's coming that they're setting this guy up as, "Why, the best prosecutor we've ever had! Why, do you know this guy ought to be named permanent prosecutor of the United States?" and what's happening here, folks, is -- I told you this. I'm going to tell you what this is really all about. You know, it's apparent now. I mean, too many people have looked into it, the people who wrote the law (sigh). It’s risky to say this before anything happens, but it just seems on paper that the whole reason for the empanelment of this independent counsel's inquiry can be written off as a non-crime. There was no violation of this espionage act, because what's-her-face, Plame, she wasn't even covert, and you have to have been covert within the last five years and there's a six-year period of time we're talking about here between the last time she was covert and when her identity came out -- and it just seems to me that what's happened here is that we've had a crime or a series of crimes or alleged crimes committed in the investigation. So we've got a cover-up of a non-crime! I mean if you look at it, we've got a cover-up of a non-crime. This is all predicated on Fitzgerald doing something. You know, this guy opened up his own website late last week. You don't see somebody doing that if they're going to come out and say, "Oops, sorry, nothing here." (sigh) But I'm still hesitant to start acting on blatant assumptions but it's hard not to when you have all stuff flittering around out there. You know what this is all about (sigh), and I predicted this to you before the 2004 elections. I said, "If Bush wins, there's going to be an all-out effort to impeach him," and that's what this is. I you want to know what this is all about, read the New York Times implosion on itself (story | story).

I know exactly what's going on at the Times. They're throwing Judy Miller overboard and they are beating themselves up in advance for coming out. They are going to nuke this White House. They're going to get back nerve's good graces by single-handedly leading the charge to take out this administration, and they're going to set themselves up as credible because they're going to have thrown one of their own overboard who collaborated with the White House, Scooter Libby, on all of this phony weapons of mass destruction intelligence -- and, of course, it was all a lie. It's going to come down now that it was all lies. It was all lies from the beginning, we're not going to hear anything about the fact that there were multiple national intelligence sources from Great Britain, the UK, around the world that we trusted on this. We're going to forget the fact that there were weapons of mass destruction used by Saddam Hussein. It's going to come down to Bush lied and people are going to say, "Yeah, well, Clinton lied and you got him for contempt, but that was only about sex. This is about 2,000 lives." That body count is happening now. The press is also upset we're starting to release the body count of the "insurgents," the terrorists, the enemy body count. The press upset about that. Story here in the Washington Post. How dare we do this? This is violating a long-term policy. We never talked about how many people we killed. So they're a little bit upset about that. You know, (sigh) Bill Clinton escaped indictment, and he lied to a federal judge, and Bill Clinton is the Democrats' and the left's greatest hero. Hillary was not charged for concealing her billing records. Some will say justice is not blind, depending on what happens here. But there's a process of decapitation afoot here.