malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:30 PM
Original message |
| According to MSNBC, three persons close |
|
to the proceedings say Official A is Rove. No surprise.
|
| deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yeah, except it'll be incredibly hard to indict Rove for that reason... |
|
because it's difficult to prove that Rove was aware that Plame was a covert agent.
|
| uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. did he lie and/or obstruct? |
| deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I'm not saying Rove's not going to be indicted; I'm just saying it's going to be hard to prove that particular charge.
|
| malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| JohnnyCougar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Unless Rove told the same lies as Libby to the jury. |
|
Or even investigators.
Rove is thinking about flipping. That's why there is the delay.
|
| deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Again, I'm not saying he's not going to be indicted... |
| npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. so why isn't that a crime (leaking classified info)? |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 08:59 PM by npincus
C'mon Fitzy!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Mar 18th 2026, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
